Impact of a systemic functional linguistic informed course on teacher candidates’ knowledge about genre and language
Abstract
This qualitative single-case study examined the impact of a course informed by Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) on teacher candidates’ knowledge about genre and language. The study was conducted with nineteen teacher candidates and lasted one semester. Data was collected through analysis of two texts: a published children’s book and a student text written by a fourth-grade bilingual student, both written in fictional narrative genre. Texts were given at the beginning and end of the course. Data was analysed through a rubric developed by the course instructor based on the SFL theory. In the rubric, twenty SFL areas regarding language and genre were created and participant comments falling under the proper area were noted on the rubric. Table of frequencies and graphs were created to present the data. Participants’ original responses were also given to provide a meaningful context for the findings. Overall results indicated that although participants did not use metalanguage to the fullest potential, they were able to identify language and genre related items with higher frequency in both texts at the end of the course. Furthermore, at the beginning of the course, participants considered the published text as having the function of giving information to a reader and teaching how to respond to literature. However, after the course participants began to use it as a model to teach how to write genre- and language-specific information. Finally, analysis of student text indicated that after the course participants learned to see the issues of children’s writing beyond mechanics.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Accurso, K., Gebhard, M., & Selden, C. (2016). Supporting L2 elementary science writing with SFL in an age of school reform. In de Oliveira & T. Silva (Eds.), Second language writing in elementary classrooms: Instructional issues, content-area writing, and teacher education (pp. 126-150). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Achugar, M., & Carpenter, B. D. (2012). Developing disciplinary literacy in a multilingual history classroom. Linguistics and Education, 23(3), 262-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2012.05.003
Achugar, M., Schleppegrell, M., & OteÃza, T. (2007). Engaging teachers in language analysis: A functional linguistics approach to reflective literacy. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 8-24.
Aguirre-Muñoz, Z., Park, J., Amabisca, A., & Boscardin, C. K. (2008). Developing teacher capacity for serving ELLs’ writing instructional needs: A case for systemic functional linguistics. Bilingual Research Journal, 31(1-2), 295-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235880802640755
Arslan, R. Ş. (2013). Integrated approach to enhancing prospective English language teachers’ writing skills. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 9(2), 1-17.
Brisk, M. E. (2015). Engaging students in academic literacies: Genre-based pedagogy in K-5 classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
Brisk, M. E., Tian, Z., & Ballard, E. (2021). Autobiography writing instruction: The journey of a teacher participating in a systemic functional linguistics genre pedagogy professional development. System, 97, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102429
Brisk, M. E., Hodgson-Drysdale, T., & O’Connor, C. (2010). A study of a collaborative instructional project informed by systemic functional linguistic theory: Report writing in elementary grades. Journal of Education, 191(1), 1-12.
Brisk, M. E., & Zisselsberger, M. (2011). “We’ve let them in on the secretâ€: Using SFL theory to improve the teaching of writing to bilingual learners. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 111-126). New York: Routledge.
Carpenter, B. D., Achugar, M., Walter, D., & Earhart, M. (2015). Developing teachers’ critical language awareness: A case study of guided participation. Linguistics and Education, 32, 82-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.03.016
Christie, F. (1999). Genre theory and ESL teaching: A systemic functional perspective. TESOL
Quarterly, 33(4), 759-763. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587889
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Derewianka, B. (1990). Exploring how texts work. Rozelle, NSW, Australia: Primary English Teaching Association.
Fang, Z., Sun, Y., Chiu, C. C., & Trutschel, B. K. (2014). Inservice teachers’ perception of a language-based approach to content area reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 37(1), 55-66.
Ferris, D. R. (1995). Student reactions to teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 33-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587804
Gebhard, M., Chen, I., Graham, H., & Gunawan, W. (2013). Teaching to mean, writing to mean: SFL, L2 literacy, and teacher education. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(2), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2013.03.005
Gebhard, M., Habana Hafner, A., & Wright, M. (2004). Teaching English language learners the language game of math. In M. Sadowski (Ed.), Teaching immigrant and second-language learners (pp. 33-46). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Publishing Group.
Gebhard, M., Harman, R., & Seger, W. (2007). Reclaiming recess: Learning the language of persuasion. Language Arts, 84(5), 419-430.
Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching second language learners in the mainstream classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teachers interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247-273.https://doi.org/10.2307/3588504
Goldenberg, C. (2008). Teaching English language learners: What the research does- and does not-say. American Educator, 32(2), 8-18.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication & Technology Journal, 30(4), 233-252.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore, WA: University Park Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. New York, NY: Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Arnold.
Hedgcock, J., & Lefkowitz, N. (1996). Some input on input: Two analyses of student response to expert feedback in L2 writing. Modern Language Journal, 80(3), 287-308.
Herrera, S. G., & Murry, K. G. (2005). Mastering ESL and bilingual methods: differentiated instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse (CLD) students. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and Bacon.
Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Kress, G. (1989). Linguistic Processes in Sociocultural Practice. Oxford: Oxford University.
Labov, W., & Waletsky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts (pp. 12-44). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.
Lee, I. (2005). Error Correction in the L2 Writing Classroom: What Do Students Think? TESL Canada Journal, 22(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84
Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. Oakville, CT: Equinox.
Martin, J., & Rothery, J. (1986). What a functional approach to the writing task can show teachers about “good writingâ€. In B. Couture (Ed.), Functional approaches to writing: Research perspectives (pp. 241-265). Norwoood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
Martin, J. R., & Veel, R. (1998). Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. New York, NY: Routledge.
McKenough, A. (2013). A developmental approach to teaching narrative composition. In S. Graham, C. A. MacArthur, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Best practices in writing instruction (2nd ed., pp. 73-112). New York, NY: Guilford.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Neuendorf, K. A. (2016). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
O’Hallaron, C. L., Palincsar, A. S., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2015). Reading science: Using systemic functional linguistics to support critical language awareness. Linguistics and Education, 32, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.02.002
Rog, L. J., & Kropp, P. (2004). The write genre. Markham, ONT, Canada: Pembroke.
Rose, D., & Martin, J. R. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney School. Sheffield: Equinox.
Roser, N., Martinez, M., Fuhrken, C., & McDonnold, K. (2007). Characters as guides to meaning. The Reading Teacher, 60(6), 548-559.
Schall-Leckrone, L., & McQuillan, P. J. (2012). Preparing history teachers to work with English learners through a focus on the academic language of historical analysis. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(3), 246–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.05.001
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schleppegrell, M., Achugar, M., & OteÃza, T. (2004). The grammar of history: Enhancing content-based instruction through a functional focus on language. TESOL Quartely, 38(1), 67-93. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588259
Schleppegrell, M. J., & Go, A. (2007). Analyzing the writing of English learners: A functional approach. Language Arts, 84(6), 529-538.
Scott, N. (2015). Academic Writing and Culture: A Study of Austrian Tertiary-Level EFL Learners. AAA: Arbeiten Aus Anglistik Und Amerikanistik, 40(1/2), 75-97.
Siepmann, D. (2006). Academic Writing and Culture: An Overview of Differences between English, French and German. Meta, 51(1), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.7202/012998ar
Slater, T., & McCrocklin, S. (2016). Learning to use systemic functional linguistics to teach literary analysis: Views on the effectiveness of a short professional development workshop. In L. C. de Oliveira & M. Shoffner, Teaching English Language Arts to English Language Learners (pp. 19-214). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yang, L., & Cahill, D. (2008). The Rhetorical Organization of Chinese and American students’ Expository Essays: A Contrastive Rhetoric Study. International Journal of English Studies, 8(2), 113-132.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research Design and Methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies