An analysis and insight into the effectiveness of scaffolding: EFL instructors’/teachers’ perceptions and attitudes

Abdelmagid Abdelrahman Awadelkarim

Abstract


This study examines the effectiveness of scaffolding in the context of Majmaah University EFL. It does so by exploring the attitudes and perceptions of a randomly selected group of (30) EFL instructors of various backgrounds and degrees. Theoretically, it is informed by a medley of relevant theories and approaches Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory of Learning, Bakhtin's Dialogism and Habermas’ Communicative Rationality. Methodologically, a combination of a questionnaire (23 participants) and focus group discussions (FGD) (7 participants) were employed to collect the data and then analyze it using a pertinent tool for each instrument. The three questions the paper set out to answer were: 1) what are the perceptions and attitudes of Majmaah University EFL teachers towards scaffolding? 2) To what extent are they aware of scaffolding in teaching? 3) What is their attitude for practicing scaffolding in pedagogical contexts?. Even though the analysis largely revealed that the participants practiced scaffolding in some way or the other and that their attitudes and perceptions regarding practical pedagogical scaffolding were exceedingly positive, there were, nonetheless, interesting complexities unveiled all along. Contrary to the seemingly participants’ perception of a strong belief of their knowledge of the principles and approaches underlying scaffolding, profound analysis suggests that they, in fact, lack adequate relevant knowledge/competence. The participants appeared less confident of their beliefs when it comes to practical and pedagogical scaffolding. The major contribution of this paper lies in the apparent gap it fills with its narrow focus on the instructors’ attitudes and perceptions alongside its innovative employment of focus group discussion (FGD) as an effective research tool.


Keywords


Scaffolding; Perceptions; Attitudes; ZPD; Dialogism; Focus group discussion (FGD)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguilar, F. A. R. (2020). What Impact Does Scaffolding Have on Level-1 Students Learning English as a Second Language? (Doctoral dissertation, Greensboro College).

Ahmadi Safa, M., & Rozati, F. (2017). The impact of scaffolding and non scaffolding strategies on the EFL learners' listening comprehension development. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 447-456.

Azir, I. D. A. (2019). Applying Peer Scaffolding to Enhance the EFL Vocational Students’ Speaking Skills. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 6(2), 149-157.

Barnawi, O. Z. (2016). The effect of negotiating pedagogies in Saudi college EFL writing classrooms. Language and Literacy, 18(1), 1-22.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Caillaud, S., & Flick, U. (2017). Focus groups in triangulation contexts. In A New Era in Focus Group Research (pp. 155-177). Palgrave Macmillan, London.

Charttrakul, K. (2009). Teaching English for young learners: a perspective view from Thai teacher. Thailand TESOL New Focus, 12-15.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

De Guerrero, M. C., &Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51-68.

De Pol, Janneke van, & Volman, Monique & Beishuizen, Jos. (2010). Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. EducPsychol Rev (2010) 22:271–296 DOI 10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. Vygotskian approaches to second language research, 33456.

Gunawardena, M. (2019). PEDAGOGIES FOR SCAFFOLDING THINKING IN ESL. Thinking Skills and Creativity in Second Language Education: Case Studies from International Perspectives, 42.

Habermas, Jurgen. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. I: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, T. McCarthy (trans.). Boston: Beacon. [German, 1981, vol. 1]

Habermas, Jurgen. (1998). On the Pragmatics of Communication, M. Cooke (ed.) Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Hammond, J., & Gibbons, P. (2005). Putting scaffolding to work: The contribution of scaffolding in articulating ESL education.

Khamwan, T. (2007). The effects of interactional strategy training on teacher-student interaction in an EFL classroom (Unpublished master thesis). Nakhon Ratchasima, Suranaree University of Technology.

Leung, L. (2015). Validity, reliability, and generalizability in qualitative research. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 4(3), 324.

Li, D., & Zhang, L. (2020). Exploring teacher scaffolding in a CLIL-framed EFL intensive reading class: A classroom discourse analysis approach. Language Teaching Research, 1362168820903340.

Mansouri, S., & Mashhadi Heidar, D. (2019). Peer/teacher technology-enhanced scaffolding through process approach and Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge: A probe into self-regulation. Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 38(3), 189-223.

Mohammed, M. F. (2020). Scaffolding with Online Tasks for Developing Critical Writing Skills of 2 nd Year Secondary School Students. Journal of Education, 76.

Nasr, M., Bagheri, M. S., Sadighi, F., &Rassaei, E. (2018). Iranian EFL teachers’ perceptions of assessment for learning regarding monitoring and scaffolding practices as a function of their demographics. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1558916.

Nomnian, S. (2002). Constructivism: Theory and its application to language teaching. Studies in Language and Language Teaching, 11, 62-71.

Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Routledge.

Pathan, H., Memon, R. A., Memon, S., Khoso, A. R., & Bux, I. (2018). A critical review of Vygotsky's sociocultural theory in second language acquisition. International Journal of English Linguistics, 8(4), 232.

Piaget, J. (1979). Comments on Vygotsky's critical remarks. Archives de Psychologie, 47(183), 237-249.

Purnomo, A., & Yuyun, I. (2019). EFL CLASSROOM AND LEARNER’S PERCEPTION ON DIRECT TRANSMISSION SCAFFOLDING. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 22(1), 98-110.

Rababah, L., & Almwajeh, M. (2018). Promoting creativity in EFL/ESL writing through scaffolding strategy. International Journal of English and Education, 7(3), 148-160.

Rachmajanti, S., Sulistyo, G. H., &Suharyadi, A. N. (2019). Developing ELT Teachers Professionally towards Capability Scaffolding Roles: Reflecting on Their Standing SWOT. ICLI 2018, 351.

Rezaee, A. A., Khomeijani Farahani, A. A., & Abdulameer Mubarak, L. (2018). Scaffolding and EFL Learners' Use of Language Learning Strategies in the Iraqi Language Teaching Context. Teaching the English Language, 12(2), 89-116.

SM Abdelshaheed, B. (2019). Using Instructional Scaffolding Strategies to Support Oral Productive Language Skills among English Majors at Majmaah University. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Volume, 10.

Taghizadeh, M., & Saadatju, S. (2020). Engineering students’ needs for listening scaffolding strategies and their perceptions of instructors’ performance in an academic listening course. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1-25.

Tajeddin, Z., & Kamali, J. (2020). Typology of scaffolding in teacher discourse: Large dataâ€based evidence from second language classrooms. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 329-343.

Teo, P. (2019). Teaching for the 21st century: A case for dialogic pedagogy. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 170-178.

Troudi, S., & Maazoun Zayani, E. (2020). Scaffolding EFL teachers' black box: towards a theoretical framework of EFL teachers’ reading knowledge.

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., Oort, F., & Beishuizen, J. (2015). The effects of scaffolding in the classroom: support contingency and student independent working time in relation to student achievement, task effort and appreciation of support. Instructional Science, 43(5), 615-641.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. The collected works of LS Vygotsky, 1, 39-285

Yu, G. (2004). Perception, practice, and progress: Significance of scaffolding and zone of proximal development for second or foreign language teachers. Asian EFL Journal, 6(4), 1-24.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies