Potential of social networks’ use in the protest movements

Olha V. Harmatiy, Mykhailo M. Basarab, Bekzhigit K. Serdali, Altyn B. Akynbekova, Aliya T. Beldibekova

Abstract


This article studies the problem of social networks use as a platform for political mobilization of society’s protest potential. Social networks are tools for spreading information. The aim of the article is to study the role of exposure and perspectives of social networks’ usage in the formation and implementation of the protest potential in the society. Disclosed technological aspects, forms and methods of social networks’ use as a means of formation and implementation of public protest potential. This article addressed practical experience of public’s political mobilization in Ukraine and the Middle East. Actualized the tendency to use social networks as a medium of dissent formation and processes control instrument of political mobilization of the society. It was shown the basic directions of social networks’ usage to achieve policy objectives (the promotion of political projects, work with target audiences) through the activation of dissent. It was determined that the use of social networks for political mobilization of society allows you to do it quickly enough, given existing precedents in other countries, factors and opportunities, ways to influence audience’s opinion in the organization and carrying out protest campaigns, aligned at the main protest target audience of social networks – the young and the middle class.

Keywords


Internet; political mobilization; social interaction; protest campaigns; new media

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aizstrauta, D., & Ginters, E. (2015). Integrated acceptance and sustainability assessment model transformations into executable system dynamics model. Procedia Computer Science, 77, 92-97.

Aizstrauta, D., Celmina, A., Ginters, E., & Mazza, R. (2013). Validation of integrated acceptance and sustainability assessment methodology. Procedia Computer Science, 26, 33-40.

Association agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and Ukraine, of the other part. (2017). Retrieved from: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/november/tradoc_155103.pdf.

Atabekova, A. (2019). Technology-facilitated harm to individuals and society: Cases of minor’s selfproduced sexual content in Russia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 6(6), 410-415.

Atabekova, A. (2020). University discourse to foster youth's sustainability in society amidst COVID19: International and Russian Features. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(18), 2463.

Atabekova, A., & Gorbatenko, R. (2017). Multilingual community and translation: Focus on information processing to enhance quality. Information (Japan), 20(7), 4677-4692.

Banerjee, T. (2020). The collective interests of large corporations: Social movement protest and the policy-planning network. Sociological Quarterly, 61(3), 389-421.

Barash, R.E., Antonovskiy, A.Y. (2019). New social movements and their evolution in the network age. Voprosy Filosofii, 2019(7), 99-110.

Brunner, E. (2017). Wild public networks and affective movements in China: Environmental activism, social media, and protest in Maoming. Journal of Communication, 67(5), 665-677.

Castells, M. (2007). Communication, power and counter-power in the network society. International Journal of Communication, 1(1), 238–266

De Aguilera, M., Casero-Ripollés, A. (2020). Technologies for transformation? Social media before political and social change. An introduction. Icono14, 16(1), 1-21.

de Moraes, G.H.S.M., Pelegrini, G.C., Pinheiro, G.T. (2020). Social media and protests engagement: What's gender got to do with it? Journal of Content, Community and Communication, 11(6), 22-31.

Ginters, E., Aizstrauts, A., & Chinea, R.M.A. (2014). Sociotechnical aspects of policy simulation. In: Handbook of Research on Advanced ICT Integration for Governance and Policy Modeling (pp. 113-128). Hershey: IGI Global.

Giraldo-Luque, S. (2018). Social protest and stages of moral development: An analytical proposal for the study of social mobilization in the 21st century. Palabra Clave, 21(2), 469-498.

Gura, D., Khoroshko, A., Sakulyeva, T., & Krivolapov, S. (2020). Intelligent data processing for navigating drones. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(2 Special Issue), 396-401.

Jost, J.T., Barberá, P., Bonneau, R., Langer, M., Metzger, M., Nagler, J., Sterling, J. & Tucker, J.A. (2018). How social media facilitates political protest: information, motivation, and social networks. Political Psychology, 39, 85-118.

Klepar, М.V. (2019). Stages and tendencies of formation of a network of institutions of higher education of Ukraine for the training of future international experts. Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 1(9), 73-77.

Kostiuk, S.S. (2020). Development of intercultural communicative competence of future specialists in the field of information technologies in the process of foreign languages learning. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 6(2), 103-112.

Kravtsov, Y.S., Chetnverikova, N.A., Saifnazarov, I.S., Dombrovska, O.V., & Khovpun, O.S. (2019). Philosophical purpose of social communication in the aspects of sustainable development of modern social reality. Asia Life Sciences, 1, 329-337.

Kyzdarbekova, M.A., Serdali, B., Bakirova, Z.A., Nurtazayeva, N.M., Doszhan, S.M., Kasymbekova, K.A., Djamalova, S.A., & Bimaganbetova, A.K. (2014). Nonverbal means of pedagogical dialogue in conditions of cross-culture communication. Life Science Journal, 11(Spec. Issue 6), 238-244.

Mares, I., Young, L.E. (2019). Conditionality & Coercion: Electoral Clientelism in Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Migdal, J.S. (1987). Strong States, Weak States: Power and accommodation. In Understanding political development (pp. 391-434). Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

Moraes, G.H.S.M., Cappellozza, A., Silva, D.S. (2018). Technology and the Dissemination of Information to participate in Protests through Social Networks. IEEE Latin America Transactions, 16(1), 287-293.

Owen, S. (2017). Monitoring social media and protest movements: Ensuring political order through surveillance and surveillance discourse. Social Identities, 23(6), 688-700.

Pantoja, S.M.R. (2019). The sense of the common and the political in virtual social networks. Aula Abierta, 48(2), 203-211.

Pylypenko, D. (2019). Editorial. Astra Salvensis, 1, 9-10.

Saifnazarov, I., Muhtarov, A., Sultonov, T., & Tolibov, A. (2020). Religious tolerance, unity of knowledge and faith issues highlighting in Imam Bukhari Hadiths. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(5), 1846-1853.

Serdali, B.K., Ashirbekova, G.S., Isaeva, Z., & Adieva, P.M. (2016). Newspaper headings as a means of presenting priority and secondary information. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(11), 4729-4738.

Serdali, B.K., Beldibekova, A.T., Zhaxylykbaeva, R.S., Uzbekova, G., & Tursyn, K. (2018). Democratic principles of education in media environment. Espacios, 39(30), 1-16.

Suleimenov, I., Bakirov, A., & Moldakhan, I. (2021). Formalization of ternary logic for application to digital signal processing. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1259, 26-35.

Suleimenov, I.E., Gabrielyan, O.A., Bakirov, A.S., & Vitulyova, Y.S. (2019). Dialectical understanding of information in the context of the artificial intelligence problems. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 630(1), 012007.

Törnberg, A., Törnberg, P. (2017). Modelling free social spaces and the diffusion of social mobilization. Social Movement Studies, 16(2), 182-202.

Valentine, O. (2018). Top 10 Reasons for Using Social Media. Retrieved from: https://blog.globalwebindex.com/chart-of-the-day/social-media.

Vinarchuk, N.M., Haliuka, O.S., & Sholovii, M.-T.I. (2021). Features of using health-saving and ICtechnologies in the formation of a socially mobile teacher in a pandemic condition. Scientific Bulletin of Mukachevo State University. Series “Pedagogy and Psychology”, 7(2), 70-78.

Volkova, S., Bachrach, Y. (2015). On predicting sociodemographic traits and emotions from communications in social networks and their implications to online self-disclosure. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking, 18(12), 726–736.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies