Negotiating metafictional aspects of postmodern narrative in Ian McEwan's atonement

Abbas Murad Dohan, Hussein Nasir Shwein

Abstract


Atonement has been regarded as McEwan's best demonstration of his protracted reflections on the form of the English novel, and his lengthy negotiations on the traditions of modern English fiction writing and criticism passed down from their predecessors. In that order, some might assume that McEwan's Atonement could be associated both with modernism and postmodernism. Some even go further to claim that the novel along with its relation to modernism and postmodernism eventually lands with realism. Such a claim is based on the assumption that the novel resists postmodernism's moral fickleness and pits against it a tradition of English empiricism. On the other hand, the current paper intends to argue otherwise; that is, to argue in favor of postmodern metafictional narrative in Atonement. A claim that could feasibly be supported by—but yet to be consolidated in the current research—the thoughts of some writers like Wood who suggest that the novel throughout its narrative events, but more particularly with its ending, could very possibly be perceived as a proper postmodern artifact, wearing its doubts on its sleeve, on the outside, as the Pompidou does its escalators.

 


Keywords


Postmodern Narrative; Fact and Fiction; Intertextuality; Self; Consciousness; Morality; Historical Material

Full Text:

PDF

References


Behrman, M. (2010). The Waiting Game: Medieval Allusions and the Lethal Nature of Passivity in Ian McEwan's Atonement. Studies in the Novel, 453-470.

Butler, M. (1997). Jane Austen and the War of Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Connolly, C. (2002). Enemies of Promise. In M. Connolly (Ed.), The Modern Movement (pp. 18-141). London: Picador.

D'Angelo, K. (2009). To Make a Novel: The Construction of a Critical Readership in Ian McEwan's 'Atonement'. Studies in the Novel, 88-105.

Dobie, A. B. (2012). Theory into Practice: An Introduction to Literary Criticism (3rd Edition ed.). Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.

Ellam, J. (2009). Ian McEwan’s Atonement. London: Continuum.

Finney, B. (2004). Briony's Stand Against Oblivion: The Making of Fiction in Ian McEwan's Atonement. Journal of Modern Literature, 68-82.

Groes, S. (Ed.). (2013). Ian McEwan: Contemporary Critical Perspectives (2nd Edition ed.). London: Bloomsbury.

Head, D. (2007). Contemporary British Novelists: Ian McEwan. (D. Lea, Ed.) Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Hidalgo, P. (2005). Memory and Storytelling in Ian McEwan’s Atonement. Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 2-82.

Huang, W. (2017). A Study on Paratexts in Ian McEwan's Atonement. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, volume 87 (pp. 636-9). Neijiang: Atlantis Press.

Landesman, C. (2007). Atonement. The Sunday Times Review, n.p.

Malcolm, D. (2002). Understanding Ian McEwan. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.

McEwan, I. (1985, June n.d.). Novelists in Interview. (J. Haffenden, Interviewer)

McEwan, I. (2001). Atonement: A Novel. London: Jonathan Cape.

McEwan, I. (2006). A Parallel Tradition . London: Gaurdian.

McEwan, I. (2007). On Atonement. New York: Anchor Books.

Pyrhonen, H. (2012). Purloined Letters in Ian McEwan's "Atonement". Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal, 103-118.

Reynolds, M. N. (2002). Ian McEwan: The Essential Guide. London: Vintage.

Shah, B. M. (2009). The Sin of Ian McEwan's Fictive Atonement :Reading his Later Nov. Wiley , 38-49.

Stenport, I. (2012). A Study of Guilt and Shame in Ian McEwan’s Atonement. EngC101, 1-27.

Taylor, C. (2002). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. London: Cambridge University Press.

Wang, J. H. (2014). Postmodern Strategies in Ian McEwan’s Major Novels. Advances in Literary Study: Scientific Research, 134-139.

Wellek, R. (1963). Some Principles of Criticism. The Critical Moment, 41-51.

Wood, J. (2002). The Trick of the Truth. The New Republic Online, N.P.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies