The Remarks Of The President Joko Widodo In Commemorating Pancasila Day During The Covid-19 Pandemic

Abd. Muqit, Nurhayati Nurhayati, Intama Jemy Polii, Sueb Sueb

Abstract


This study discusses the remarks of the president Republic of Indonesia, Mr Joko Widodo (Jokowi), in commemorating Pancasila Day, June 1st, 2020, in Bogor Presidential Palace. This study is qualitative. The data are in the form of words, sentences, and phrases taken from the official speech of Mr Jokowi. The findings of this study reveal that the remarks of Mr. Jokowi assert the importance of ideology as the principle of Indonesia. He also depicts the identities of Indonesian people, shows the reality of Indonesia in facing the pandemic, motivates his people in facing the Covid-19 pandemic, and shows solutions to pass the Covid-19 pandemic. This study concluded that the remarks released by the president highlighted the importance of the Pancasila ideology in sustaining the nations and the need of hard work every time. The speech also motivates his people to handle every situation and cooperate with the Covid 19 pandemic.


Keywords


remarks; identity; covid 19; ideology; motivation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, F. D., Kuypers, J. A. (2005). the practice of rhetorical analysis.

A. M. Flor and E. U. Juan (Eds.). (2010). Theoretical, empirical, and methodological concerns in speech act performance (Vol. 26). Publisher John Benjamins.

Agustinus, Evvy Silalahi, and Rutanta. The Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, vol. 1, no. 1, article titled "The Sheath Warrior Returns: Identity and Ideology of the Nation," DOI: 10.21070/ijler.2020.v7.459

A. Georgakopoulou and D. Goutsos (2004). Introduction to discourse analysis. Press of Edinburgh University.

A. Pennycook (1997). EAP, critical pragmatism, and vulgar pragmatism. 16(4), 253-269. English for specific uses.

A. S. Greene (2000). Speech by the government on complex issues. Fordham Law Review 69 (2016): 1667.

A. Scalia (1989). judicial respect for legal interpretations made by administrative bodies. L. Duke, 511.

Consumer Ideology, Bernd Schmitt et al. Journal of Consumer Research, vol. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucab044, vol. 49, no. 1, 2022.

F. N. A. Priatmoko (2013). Analysis of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's speech in terms of critical discourse. Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Skripsi.

However, D. Butt, R. Fahey, R. Spinks, & C. Yallop (2000). The National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research's Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer's Guide. Google Scholar for Macquarie University Sydney.

Hello, Darma. Media Informasi Kementrian Pertahanan Wira, vol. 1, "Memperkokoh Identitas Nasional Untuk Meningkatkan Nasionalisme." 69th volume, no. No.53, 2017, pp. 6–12.

Interculturalism: A New Diversity Ideology with Interrelated Dialogue, Unity, and Identity Flexibility, Verkuyten, Maykel, et al. European Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 2020, Volume 50, Number 3, DOI:10.1002/ejsp.2628

G. A. Kennedy (2007). Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse by Aristotle George A. Kennedy's translation includes an introduction, notes, and appendices. Oxford University Press: New York G. Brown, G. Yule, and G. (1983). discourse examination. University of Cambridge Press

https://setkab.go.id/en/message-of-the-president-of-the-republic-of-indonesia-on-the-commemoration-of-pancasila-birthday-monday-1-june-2020-garuda-room-bogor-presidential-palace-west-java/

International Journal of Creativity, Change, and Innovation. Ijicc.Net, vol. 8, no. 12, 2019.

Itamar A. Richards (1936). Rhetorical Theory and Practice.

J. J. Macionis and L. M. Gerber (2011). Sociology. Pearson Prentice Hall, Toronto. ISBN 9780137001613. OCLC 652430995.

J.E. Richardson (2007). examining news sources. using a critical discourse analysis methodology. Palgrave Macmillan, New York.

J. Blocher (2011). Perspective neutrality and public speaking. 52, 695, BCL Rev.

K. Burke. (1969). An Argument from Motives. UC Press, Berkeley.

L. Alexander (2006). Forced speech. Const. 23. Comment. 147

L. Chouliaraki (2008). discourse examination.

M. A. Halliday (1985). Grammar is one of the discourse analysis dimensions. Discourse analysis handbook, 2, 29–56.

Mey, J. L. (2012). pragmatics that anticipate. 44(5) of the Journal of Pragmatics, 705-708.

N. Fairclough (1992). Discourse analysis includes linguistic and intertextual examination of the text and discourse. 192–217 in Discourse & Society, 3(2).

N. Fairclough (1995). The critical study of discourse is critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.

N. Fairclough, R. Wodak, (1997). analysis of critical discourse. Discourse as Social Interaction, van Dijk, T. A. (Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, vol. 2).

N. Fairclough (2014). critical awareness of language Routledge.

"Quo Vadis: Can Indonesia Survive without Pancasila?," by Saifullah Bombang et al.

R. Bradford (1997). Stylistics. Mental Health Press

Rahardjo, Rahardjo, et al. “Theme and Rheme Analysis and Politeness Strategy in Diplomatic Workplace Writing: A Discourse Analysis.” Getsempena English Education Journal, vol. 8, no. 1, 2021, pp. 123–33, doi:10.46244/geej.v8i1.1292.

S. Frogel (2005). The theory of rhetoric (Vol. 3). Publisher John Benjamins.

S. M. Kennison (2013). Introduction to the development of language. Publications by Sage.

S. Shiffrin (1979). Governmental Address. 27, 565 UClA L. Rev

T. A. Van Dijk (2000). A discourse analysis approach to new racism. 37, 33–49. Ethnic minorities and the media.

T. A. Van Dijk (2006). discourse analysis and ideologies. 115–140 in Journal of Political Ideologies, 11(2).

Wang, J. (2010). A critique of Barack Obama's talks in terms of discourse. 1(3), 254–261; Journal of Language Teaching and Research.

Wodak, R., and G. Weiss (2003). Analysis of Critical Discourse. Interdisciplinarity and theory. Pamphlet Macmillan

Wodak, R., and G. Weiss (2004). Organizing, portraying, and legitimizing Europe: visions, ideologies, and utopias in the discursive production of European identities.

Yayoi Kato Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, vol. 3, no. 2, "Two Faces of Ideology: Double-Edged Functions of Ideology in the Reform Discourse Under Xi Jinping." 49, no. 2, 2020, doi:10.1177/1868102620933899.

Obiora, Harriet Chinyere, et al. "Critical Discourse Analysis of Selected Nigerian Political Hate Speeches." Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 12, no. 3, 2021, pp. 494–500, doi:10.17507/jltr.1203.20.

Cavanaugh, Jillian R. "Language Ideology Revisited." International Journal of the Sociology of Language, vol. 2020, no. 263, 2020, doi:10.1515/ijsl-2020-2082.

Ghanizadeh, Afsaneh, et al. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Second Language Learning and Teaching, 2020, doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56711-8_3.

Rustanta, Agustinus, and Evvy Silalahi. “The Sheath Warrior Returns Identity and Ideology of the Nation.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, vol. 7, 2020, doi:10.21070/ijler.2020.v7.459.

Bombang, Saifullah, et al. “Quo Vadis: Can Indonesia Survive without Pancasila?” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change. Www.Ijicc.Net, vol. 8, no. 12, 2019.

Kato, Yayoi. “Two Faces of Ideology: Double-Edged Functions of Ideology in the Reform Discourse Under Xi Jinping.” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, vol. 49, no. 2, 2020, doi:10.1177/1868102620933899.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies