Professional Well-Being And The Psychological Status Of Teachers Of High Schools Run By Different Types Of School Management: A Survey

Sr. M. Lidwin Mary, Dr. C. Sherine Vinoca Snehalatha

Abstract


The Researchers of the current study have scientifically conceived the rarely talked about inherent problem of the school teachers – Professional wellbeing – capable of debilitating their efforts and acumen, - and successfully executed the same to arrive at valid findings.  A sample of 400 teachers of high schools in the region of Chennai Central Educational district was chosen by stratification done on type of school management by random sampling; and administered. As perceived, the overall Professional wellbeing and all its dimensions exhibited significant correlation with Resilience and Compassion and are predicted by the same independent variables.  More importantly, the demographic variable – Type of School Management – did shed light on the uniqueness of the teachers of Government, Aided and Private schools. As envisaged by the Researchers, the Government school teachers scored ‘High’ in overall Professional wellbeing because of high attainment in three of the Four dimensions – Affective wellbeing, Autonomy and Competence, despite a poor show in Resilience and Compassion. The Aided school teachers settled at Moderate level in their overall Professional wellbeing, along with its dimensions Affective wellbeing, Aspiration and Autonomy. They fared so poor to strike Low in Competence and a disappointing moderate level in Resilience and Compassion.  The much focused teachers of Private schools exhibited Moderate level overall attainment in Professional wellbeing along with the dimension Autonomy; however, they have saved their face by striking High in Aspiration and Competence. The differential analysis confirmed the Top position in overall Professional wellbeing for the Government school teachers, the Second position for the Private and the Third position for the Aided school teachers. The study also threw sufficient light on the interactive effect of the independent variables over the dependent ones.


Keywords


Teacher professional wellbeing, Resilience, Compassion, Type of school management, Survey method.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aragon, (2016). Teacher shortages: What we know. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.

Burns & Machin, (2013). Employee and workplace wellbeing: A multi-level analysis of teacher personality and organizational climate in Norwegian teachers from rural, urban and city schools. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(3), 309–324.

Connor, Kathryn, M & Davidson, Jonathan, R.T (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Depression and Anxiety, 18, 76 – 82, 2003.

Cook, et al, (2017). Promoting secondary teachers’ wellbeing and intentions to implement evidence‐based practices: Randomised evaluation of the achiever resilience curriculum. Psychology in the Schools, 54(1), 13–28.

Craig, (2014). International teacher attrition: Multiperspective views. Teachers and Teaching, 23(8), 859–862.

Day and Quing, (2009). Teacher emotions: Wellbeing and effectiveness. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 15–31). Dordrecht: Springer.

Den Brok, et al, (2017). Exploring beginning teachers’ attrition in the Netherlands. Teachers and Teaching, 23(8), 881–895.

Ellis, et al, (2017). The hiring process matters: The role of person–job and person–organization fit in teacher satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 53(3), 448–474.

https://doi.org/10. 1177/0013161X16687007.

Howard and Johnson, (2004). Resilient teachers: resisting stress and burnout. SocialPsychology of Education: An International Journal, 7(4), 399–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-004-0975-0.

Jarden, R, Jarden, A; Oades, L.G, (2017). Wellbeing policy in Australia and New Zealand, In Slade L; Odes & Jarden, A (Eds), Wellbeing recovery and mental health, Cambridge University.

Klusmann, et al, (2008). Teachers’ occupational well-being and quality of instruction: The important role of self-regulatory patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 702–715. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.702

Leithwood, (2006). Teacher working conditions that matter: evidence for change, Elementary teachers federation of Ontario.

Manyika, et al, (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. New York: McKinsey Global Institute.

Mason & Matas, (2015). Teacher attrition and retention research in Australia: Towards a new theoretical framework. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(11), 45–66.

Mattern & Bauer, (2014). Does teachers’ cognitive self-regulation increase their occupational wellbeing? The structure and role of self-regulation in the teaching context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 58–68.

McCallum, et al, (2017). Teacher wellbeing: A review of the literature. Sydney, NSW AIS.

Pommier, E., Neff. K. D & Toth-Kiraly, I (2019). The development and validation of the compassion scale, Assessment SAGE, 27 (1), 21 – 39.

Sutcher, et al, (2016). A coming crisis in teaching? Teacher supply, demand, and shortages in the US. Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute.

Tarrasch, et al, (2020). Mindfulness and compassion as key factors in improving teacher’s well being. Mindfulness, 11(4), 1049–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01304-x.

Vesely, Saklofske & Nordstokke, (2014). EI training and pre-service teacher wellbeing. Personality and Individual Differences, 65, 81–85.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies