The Impact Of Gendered Language On Our Communication And Perception Across Contexts And Domains

Israt Jahan

Abstract


This research examines the impact of gendered language on communication and perception in various contexts and domains. Gendered language refers to using words, phrases, concepts, or tones associated with a particular gender. The research used a mixed-methods methodology, using both an online survey and an online experiment. The poll assesses the explicit stereotypes held by respondents regarding gendered language and communication in various contexts and domains. The study examines the impact of gendered language on communication and perception among speakers and listeners in various contexts and domains. It employs a matched-guise technique to change the voice quality of a simulated partner in a computer-mediated discussion. The research reveals that the participants exhibit varying degrees of stereotypes regarding gendered language and communication, ranging from moderate to strong. Additionally, the participants evaluate their partner's conversational conduct and personality traits differently based on their partner's voice quality. However, it is important to note that other factors have a moderating role in this effect. The study's findings provide partial support for the idea that gendered language substantially impacts the communication and perception of both speakers and listeners. However, it is important to note that this effect is not universally consistent. This research makes a valuable contribution to the existing body of literature on gendered language and communication by employing an innovative methodology and doing a comparative analysis with other studies. The study additionally offers valuable insights and implications for future scholarly investigations and practical applications pertaining to gendered language and communication.


Keywords


Gendered language, Communication, Perception, Context, Domain

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Baker, M., & Cornelson, K. (2018). Gender-Based Occupational Segregation and Sex Differences in Sensory, Motor, and Spatial Aptitudes. Demography, 55(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0706-3

Blackburn, R. M., Jarman, J., & Brooks, B. (2000). The puzzle of gender segregation and inequality: A cross-national analysis. European Sociological Review, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/16.2.119

Burke, S., & Collins, K. M. (2001). Women in Management Review Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills Gender differences in leadership styles and management skills. Management Review International Journal of Conflict Management Iss Leadership &amp Organization Development Journal Iss Organization Development Journal, 16(5).

Castellano, P. S. (2023). AXONOMÍA DE LAS GARANTÍAS JURÍDICAS EN EL EMPLEO DE LOS SISTEMAS DE INTELIGENCIA ARTIFICIAL. Revista de Derecho Politico, 117, 153–196. https://doi.org/10.13039/501100011033

DeFranza, D., Mishra, H., & Mishra, A. (2020a). How language shapes prejudice against women: An examination across 45 world languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000188

DeFranza, D., Mishra, H., & Mishra, A. (2020b). How language shapes prejudice against women: An examination across 45 world languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(1), 7–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000188

Doughman, J., & Khreich, W. (2022a). Gender Bias in Text: Labeled Datasets and Lexicons. http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08675

Doughman, J., & Khreich, W. (2022b). Gender Bias in Text: Labeled Datasets and Lexicons. http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.08675

Flaherty, M. (2001). How a Language Gender System Creeps into Perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022101032001005

Gygax, P. M., Elmiger, D., Zufferey, S., Garnham, A., Sczesny, S., von Stockhausen, L., Braun, F., & Oakhill, J. (2019a). A language index of grammatical gender dimensions to study the impact of grammatical gender on the way we perceive women and men. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JULY). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01604

Gygax, P. M., Elmiger, D., Zufferey, S., Garnham, A., Sczesny, S., von Stockhausen, L., Braun, F., & Oakhill, J. (2019b). A Language Index of Grammatical Gender Dimensions to Study the Impact of Grammatical Gender on the Way We Perceive Women and Men. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01604

Hussey, K. A., Katz, A. N., & Leith, S. A. (2015). Gendered Language in Interactive Discourse. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 44(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-014-9295-5

Ma, R., Atwell Seate Atwell Seate, A., Seate, A., & Atwell Seate, A. (n.d.). Reexamining the use of tentative language in emails: The effects Reexamining the use of tentative language in emails: The effects of gender salience and gender typicality of gender salience and gender typicality Recommended Citation Recommended Citation. https://digitalcommons.butler.edu/ccom_papers/191

Morgan, K. (Konrad). (2004). Human perspectives in the Internet society : culture, psychology, and gender. WIT Press.

Munira, S., Hossain, A., & Nessa, M. (2020). The Perception of Using Language in Gender Disparity: A Study on Tertiary Level Students. Asian Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.20849/ajsss.v5i1.708

Newman, M. L., Groom, C. J., Handelman, L. D., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2008). Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples. In Discourse Processes (Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 211–236). https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530802073712


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies