Dominance of Americanization in a Translation Task: A Pilot Study in the Iranian University Training

Nematullah Shomoossi, Amin Marzban

Abstract


The present study aims to examine the predominant use of American English in the current language use of studetns of English in Iran. The participants in the study consisted of 40 students of English at Shiraz Islamic Azad University, Iran, who were chosen randomly. A written translation task consisting of two separate lists of 20 Persian words was used. The first list was intended to check their choice of either British or American spellings. The second list, however, tapped their choice of lexical equivalents in either American or British varieties. Statistical analyses were run within the framework of within and between type effects, and the results indicated the priority of American spelling and lexical equivalents over the British variety. The results of the present study would shed light on the current language teaching and learning practices especially when it comes to a choice of international English textbooks available on the market.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Appadurai, A. (1990). Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. In Featherstone M. (Ed.), Global Culture: nationalism, globalization and modernity (pp. 295-310). London: Sage Publishers.

Coupland, N., and Bishop, H. (2007). Ideologised values for British accents. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(1): 74-93.

Hamelink, C. (1994). Trends in World Communication: on disempowerment and self-empowerment. Penang: Southbound and Third World Network.

Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1): 83-103.

Kuo, I. (2006). Addressing the issue of teaching English as a lingua franca. ELT Journal, 60(3): 213-221

Kachru, B.B. (1986). The Alchemy of English. The spread, functions and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon.

Phillipson, R. (1998). Globalizing English: Are Linguistic Human Rights an Alternative to Linguistic Imperialism? Oxford: Pergamon.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies