Theory–practice dichotomy: Prospective teachers' evaluations about teaching English to young learners

Süleyman Nihat ŞAD

Abstract


This study aims at examining the prospective teachers‟ evaluations about the implementation of the primary ELT curriculum. Also it is aimed to inquire the possible problems and difficulties in teaching English to children. The study is based on qualitative case study design. Qualitative data were collected using participant journaling method from 31 preservice teachers who kept reflective journals throughout their observations of five mentor teachers. The data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis method by coding and creating categories/themes. Results showed that actual practices do not adequately meet the curricular and theoretical requirements in terms of objectives, content, learning-teaching experiences and evaluation. This theory-practice dichotomy about teaching English to children mainly includes the problems such as non-communicative objectives, failure to appeal students emotionally, overdominance of coursebooks and grammar content over communicative content, use of restricted methodology, ineffective use of technology and materials, insecure (coercive, aggressive, and discriminative) classroom atmosphere, lack of or inproper use of game activities, lack of group or pair work, failure to consider individual differences, lack or inappropriate integration of language skills, improper process evaluation, inadequate feedback, and traditional evaluation practices.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afia, J. B. (2006). English clubs: Introducing English to young learners. English Teaching Forum, 44 (2), 20-23

Agullo, G. L. (2006). Overcoming age-related differences. ELT Journal, 60 (4), 365-373.

Biklen, S. K., & Casella, R. (2007). A practical guide to the qualitative dissertation. New York and London: Teachers College Press.

Birdsong, D. (1999). Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brewster, J., Ellis, G., & Girard, D. (2004). The Primary English Teacher’s Guide (New Edition) England: Pearson Education Limited.

British Sociological Association Medical Sociology Group (1996). Criteria for the evaluation of qualitative research papers. Medical Sociology News, 22(1), 69-71

Büyükduman, F. İ. (2005). The opinions of elementary school English teachers on the English curriculum for elementary schools. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi 28, 55-64

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching Languages to Young Learners. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Council of Higher Education (2009). www.yok.gov.tr

Demirezen, M. (2003). Yabancı dil ve anadil öğreniminde kritik dönemler. Dil Dergisi, 118,5-15.

Downe-Wamboldt, B. (1992). Content analysis: Method, applications, and issues. Health Care for Women International, 13, 313-321.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Creating a Motivating Classroom Environment. In Jim Cummins and Chris Davison (Editors) International Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 719-731). New York, USA: Springer Science+Business Media.

Edelenbos, P. (1997). Evaluation and assessment. In Peter Doyé and Alison Hurrell (Editors), Foreign Language Learning in Primary Schools (pp. 63-76). Strasbourg: The Council of Europe.

Er, K.O. (2006). Evaluation of English curricula in 4th and 5th grade primary schools. Ankara University, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 39(2), 1-25

Ersen-Yanık, A. (2008). Primary school English teachers‟ perceptions of the English Language curriculum of 6th, 7th and 8th grades. H. U. Journal of Education, 35, 123-134.

Faizah, A. M. (2008). The use of reflective journals in outcome-based education during the teaching practicum. Malaysian Journal Of ELT Research, 4, 32-42.

Gordon, T. (2007). Teaching young children a second language. USA: Praeger Publisher.

Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. (4th ed.) Harlow: Pearson Longman Limited.

Hatch, A. T. (2002). Doing Qualitative Research in Educational Settings. USA: State University of New York Press.

İşpınar, D. (2005). A study on teachers‟ awareness of teaching English to young learners. Unpublished dissertation, Çukurova University, Institute of Social Sciences, English language teaching department, Adana.

Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60-99.

Johnson, J. S. & Newport, E. L. (1991). Critical period effects on universal properties of language: the status of subjacency in the acquisition of a second language. Cognition, 39, 215-258.

Katsuyama, H., Nishigaki, C., & Wang, J. (2008). The effectiveness of English teaching in Japanese elementary schools: Measured by proficiency tests administered to seventh-year students. RELC Journal, 39 (3), 359-80.

Kırkgöz, Y. (2007). English language teaching in Turkey: Policy changes and their implementations. RELC Journal, 38; 216-228

Kırkgöz, Y. (2009). Evaluating the English textbooks for young learners of English at Turkish primary education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 79-83.

Koller, M. K. (2006). Editor‟s notes. English Teaching Forum, 44 (2), 1.

Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. New York: Pergamon Press Inc.

Krashen, S., Long, M. & Scarcella, R. (1979). Age, rate, and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573-582.

Larsen-Freeman, D. (2000). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Little, D. & Perclová, R. (2001). The European Language Portfolio: a guide for teachers and teacher trainers. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Modern Language Division.

Long, M. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, 251-285.

Matsuoka, R. & Smith, I. (2008). Age Effects in Second Language Acquisition: Overview, J Nurs Studies NCNJ, 7(1), 33-40

Ministry of National Education (2006). Elementary Schools Curriculum for Teaching English (4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, and 8th classes). Ankara: Board of education of Ministry of National Education.

Mixon, M. & Temu, P. (2006). First road to learning language through stories. English Teaching Forum, 44 (2), 14-19.

Moon, J. (2000). Children Learning English. Oxford: Macmillan Heinemann.

Richards J.C. & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Robertson, P. (2002) The critical age hypothesis. A critique of research methodology. Asian EFL Journal, 4(1). http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/marcharticles_pr.php.

Robinson, P. (2003). The cognition hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45-105.

Schindler, A. (2006). Channeling children‟s energy through vocabulary activities. English Teaching Forum, 44 (2), 8-12.

Scott, W. A., & Ytreberg, L.H. (2001). Teaching English to Children (14th ed.). New York: Longman.

Shin, J. K. (2006). Ten helpful ideas for teaching English to young learners. English Teaching Forum, 44 (2), 2-13.

Singleton, D. (1995). The Age Factor in Second Language Acquisition. A Critical Look at the Critical Period Hypothesis. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Singleton, D. and Ryan, L. (2004). Language Acquisition: The Age Factor (2nd edition). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Slatterly, M., & Willis, J. (2003). English for Primary Teachers. Oxford: Oxford Uni. Press.

Phillips, S. (1994). Young learners (2nd Ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri [Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

Ytreberg, L. (1997). Methods. In Peter Doyé and Alison Hurrell (Editors), Foreign Language Learning in Primary Schools (pp. 25-34). Strasbourg: The Council of Europe.

Zhao, A.H.Q. ve Morgan, C. (2004). Consideration of age in L2 attainment-children, adolescents and adults. Asian EFL Journal, 6(4).

Zincir, B. (2006). 5th Grade English Teachers‟ Evaluations of Curriculum Objectives. Unpublished Master Thesis, educational Sciences Institute, Anadolu University, Eskişehir.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies