Effects of Form-Focused Instruction on the Learning of Relative Clauses

Seyed Jalal Abdolmanafi

Abstract


Problem Statement: Relativization is an important grammatical sub-system for second language learners. This study intended to explore the effects of different types of L2 instruction on the learning of English relative clauses by Persian learners.
Purpose: The differential effects of the three types of treatment (i.e., Focus on FormS, Focus on Meaning, Focus on Form) on the learning of English relativization was investigated.
Methods: Intact university classes of English learners were divided into three groups receiving different forms of instruction. Accuracy of the target form was measured by two distinct tasks of sentence combining test and grammaticality judgment test.
Findings and Results: The results of the two tests show improvement of all three groups, the focus on form treatment group outperformed the other two on both tests, however. This study also suggests that learners’ attention to detailed analysis of form facilitates the learning of relative clauses in this context.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdolmanafi, S.J. (2010). The effects of explicit grammar instruction on the acquisition of English relative clauses by Persian learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Mysore, India.

Ammar, A. & Lightbown, P.M. (2004). Teaching marked linguistic structures - More about the acquisition of relative clauses by Arab learners of English. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language learning (pp.167-198). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2002). Metalanguage in focus on form in the communicative classroom. Language Awareness, 11(1), 1-13.

Canale, M. (1983). From communicative competence to communicative language pedagogy. In J. Richards & R. Schmidt (Eds.), Language and communication. London: Longman.

Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Doughty, C. (1991). Second language instruction does make a difference. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(4), 431-469.

Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998a). Issues and terminology. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.1-11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (1998b). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp.197-261). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, N.C. (1993). Rules and instances in foreign language learning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5, 289-318.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2001). Introduction: investigating Form-focused instruction. Language Learning, 51, 1-46.

Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-107.

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus-on-form. System, 30(4), 419-432.

Fotos, S. (1994). Integrating grammar instruction and communicative language use through grammar consciousness-raising tasks. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 323-351.

Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Izumi, S. (2002). Output, input enhancement, and the noticing hypothesis: An experimental study on ESL relativization. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 541-577.

Izumi, S. (2003). Processing difficulty in comprehension and production of relative clauses by learners of English as a second language. Language Learning, 53(2), 258-323.

Izumi, Y. & Izumi, S. (2004). Investigating the effects of oral output on the learning of relative clauses in English: Issues in the psycholinguistic requirements for effective output tasks. Canadian Modern Language Review, 60, 587-609.

Kempees, S. (2011). L2 Proficiency: A Study in Comparing Effects of Two Methods – Focus on Form and Focus on FormS – on General Proficiency in L2. Master's Thesis, University of Groningen.

Krashen, S. (1973). Lateralization, language learning, and the critical period: Some new evidence. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 63-74.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London: Longman.

Larsen-Freeman, D.L., & Long, M.H. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. Longman Group UK Ltd.

Lim, J. (2001). The effects of different types of instruction: Focus-on-form study. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 253-266.

Long, M. (1991). Focus on forms: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Long, M. & Robinson, P. (1998). Theory, research and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Ed.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.

Muriungi, P. K., Mukuthuria, M. and Gatavi, M. (2011). Education and language: Errors in English language and their remedies. The Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 7(2), 87-116.

Rutherford, W. & Sharwood Smith, M. (1988). Grammar and second language teaching. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Sadighi, F. & Jafarpur, A. (1994). Is there a role for learner treatment in comprehending relative clauses? RELC Journal, 25(1), 56-74.

Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 27, 205-214.

Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.

Spada, N. & Lightbown, P.M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83, 1-22.

VanPatten, B. (2002). Processing instruction: An update. Language Learning, 52, 755-803.

White, J. (1998). Getting the learner’s attention: A typographical input enhancement study. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-61.

Widdowson, H.G. (1990). Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Willis, J. (1996). A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, Essex: Longman.

Wong, W. (2003). Textual enhancement and simplified input effects on L2 comprehension and acquisition of non-meaningful grammatical form. Applied Language Learning, 13(2), 109-132.

Yabuki-S, N. (2007). Teaching relative clauses in Japanese: Exploring alternative types of instruction and the projection effect. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29(2), 219-252.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies