Existential negation in Turkish: A functional approach
Abstract
Â
Existential negation is the one type of negation present in languages, which its item is called “negative existentialâ€, and it provides to tell the case of “absenceâ€, “lackâ€, “there is notâ€, “poorâ€, “emptyâ€, “dead†etc. Negative existentials are generally used for the common similarity of a structure as morphological, syntactic and semantic typologies. In Turkish, existential negation occurs with the independent morpheme yok, which is defined as “absolute absence/non-existenceâ€. Yok is the main negative existential that is different from the standard negation and it is a separate lexical item with negative content. Since it is a powerful negator with its “absolute absence/non-existence†meaning, it can be used in different positions, such as existential negation, possessive negation, emphatic negation, standard negation, short answer “noâ€, prohibition or double negation. In addition to yok, the bound morpheme -sXz is used with “without/lack†meaning in existential negation by implying the non-existence case. Besides, general rejection item deÄŸil, which means “is notâ€, is used in existential negation, which implies the non-existentiality by rejecting the existence case that is presupposed.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ağca, F. (2015). Eski Türkçede Varlık ve Yokluk İşaretleyicileri. Dil Araştırmaları, 16: 83-101.
Çakmak, S. (2013). “Var†ve “Yok†Sözcüklerinin Morfolojik Kimliği. Turkish Studies, 8/4: 463-471.
Clauson, G. (1972). An Etymological Dictionary of Pre-Thirteenth-Century Turkish. Oxford.
Croft, W. (1991). The Evolution of Negation. Journal of Linguistics, 27: 1-39.
Erdal, M. (1991). Old Turkic Word Formation. Leiden: Brill.
Erdal, M. (2004). A Grammar of Old Turkic. Leiden: Brill.
Erguvanlı,T. E. (1984). Some Aspects of Negation in Turkish. In Proceedings of the Turkish Linguistics Conference, Aksu-Koç, A. and E. Erguvanlı-Taylan (eds). İstanbul: Bogaziçi Publications.
Hengeveld, K. (1992). Non-verbal Predicability. In Meaning and Grammar: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives, Michel Kefer & Johan van der Auwera (eds). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Erk Emeksiz, Z. (2010). Negation in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları. 2: 1-15.
Horn, Laurance, R. (2001). A Natural History of Negation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Kerslake, C. & Göksel, A. (2005). Turkish: A Comparative Grammar. London: Routledge.
Krifka, M. (1995). The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items. Linguistic Analysis 25: 209-257.
Krifka, M. (2007). Negated Antonyms: Creating and Filling the Gap. In Uli Sauerland and Penka Stateva (eds), Presupposition and implicature in compositional semantics. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan: 163-177.
Miestemo, M. (2007). Negation- An Overview of Typological Research. Language and Linguistics Compass 1/5 (2007): 552–570.
Russel, B. (1903). The Principles of Mathematics. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Russel, B. (1905). On Denoting. Mind 14:479-93.
Tekin, T. (2003). Orhon Türkçesi Grameri. İstanbul: Kitap Matbaası.
Tekin, T. (2009). Orhon Yazıtları, Ankara: TDK.
Tura, S. (1981). A study on negation in Turkish. Unpublished ms.
Van Shaaik, G. (1994). Turkish. In kahrel Peter & René van der Berg (eds.). Typological Studies in Negation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company: 35-50.
Veselinova, L. (2013). Negation in Existential Sentences: A Cross-Linguistic Study. In Delia Bentley, Francesco Maria Ciconte and Silvio Cruschina (eds.) [Special issue] Italian Journal of Linguistics 25 (1): 107–145.
Veselinova, L. (2014). Negative Existential Cycle Revisited. Linguistics 52(6): 1327–1389.
Van der Wouden, T. (1997). Negative Contexts: Collocation, polarity and multiple negation, London: Routledge.
Zeijlstra, H. Hedde. (2002). What the Jespersen’s Cycle May Reveal about Negative Concord. Linguistics in Potsdam 19: 183-216.
Zeijlstra, H., Hedde. (2004a). Two Ways of Expressing Negation, Proceeding of ConSOLE 12: 245-259.
Zeijlstra, H., Hedde. (2004b). Sentential Negation and Negative Concord, Netherlands: LOT.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies