Examining the effect of explicit instruction on vocabulary learning and on receptive-productive gap: An experimental study

Infanta Vincy Rajendran

Abstract


This research study emphasized on the importance of explicit instruction and repeated exposure to the target vocabulary for effective reception and production of new words among the second language learners of English. The purpose of the study was to examine the efficacy of the researcher- created supplementary for the prescribed set of vocabulary in the English language textbook. The study aimed to find the amount of influence the explicit instruction and repeated exposure to the target vocabulary had on the nature of the receptive- productive gap.  The results of the study showed that the explicit instruction and repeated exposure to the target vocabulary had a significant amount of influence on vocabulary knowledge when compared to the conventional way of vocabulary instruction. In the conventional mode of vocabulary instruction, reception of vocabulary was found to have an average of 8% influence on the production knowledge, whereas in the case of the experimental group, it amounted up to 72%. This analysis showed that through explicit instruction and repeated exposure to the target vocabulary the receptive- productive gap is significantly reduced.

Keywords


explicit instruction; repeated exposure; receptive vocabulary; productive vocabulary; receptive-productive gap

Full Text:

PDF

References


Henriksen, B. (1999). Three dimensions of vocabulary development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303-317.

Joe, A. (2010). The quality and frequency of encounters with vocabulary in English for academic purposes program. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 117- 138.

Laufer, B., & Nation. I. S. P. (1999). A vocabulary size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16, 33- 51.

Liang, H. (2019). (Book Review) Expand your English: A Guide to Improving your Academic Vocabulary by Steve Hart. Asian EFL Journal, 23(6.1), 142-143.

Masruddin. (2019). The efficacy of using spelling bee game in teaching vocabulary to Indonesian English as a Foreign Language students. Asian EFL Journal, 23(6.3), 173-180.

Meara, P. (1997). Towards a new approach to modelling vocabulary acquisition. In: N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 109- 121). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Melka, F. (1997). Receptive vs. productive aspects of vocabulary. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp.82- 102). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Nagy, W. (1997). On the role of context in first- and second- language vocabulary learning. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 64- 83). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

O'Dell, F. (1997). Incorporating vocabulary into the syllabus. In N. Schmitt & M. McCarthy (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy (pp. 258- 278). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Palmberg, R. (1987). Patterns of vocabulary development in foreign language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 9, 201- 220.

Pamintuan, C.F., Mallari, D. G., Garcia, N. T., Galang, J. P., Buduan, R. M. (2018). The use of WeChat application on CFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition. TESOL International Journal, 13(4), 26-38.

Richards, J. C. (1976). The role of vocabulary teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 10 (1), 77-89.

Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

State Council of Educational Research and Training. (2017). TNCF 2017 Draft Syllabus English Language. Retrieved from http://tnscert.org/webapp2/tn17syllabus.aspx?language=LG-1&status=Active

Thornbury, S. (2006). How to teach vocabulary. Pearson Education India.

Waring, R. (1999). Tasks for Assessing Second Language Receptive and Productive Vocabulary. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.robwaring.org/papers/phd/ch1.html

Wesche, M. and T. Paribakht. (1996). Assessing vocabulary knowledge: depth vs. breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53 (1), 13-40.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies