Mora in Basrah Arabic: A Morpho-Phonological approach
Abstract
This paper has been written to fall within the orbit of the moraic framework of the syllable, particularly the syllable weight, of Basrah Arabic. Universal as its nature is, mora, when studied and then applied, has, metaphorically speaking, the power of casting its phonological 'spell' over the problems of the morpho-phonology of Basrah tri-segmental verbs, adjectives and nouns which have popped up in the context of investigating the behavior of Basrah syllabicity, and thus the mora 'spell' gets these problematic issues easily solvable and surmountable. The problems overcome by applying the moraic model are of two facets: some of them are phonologically-based problems and others are morphologically-based ones. Either case, mora is manipulated to throw its shadow on them equally and adequately. With this in mind, the application of moraic aspects to some Basrah verbs presupposes a drastic shift in segmental durations, namely, vowel ones when occurred word-medially. Among different results reached by this paper is that Basrah Arabic syllabic templates of certain verbs, adjectives and nouns need to be pinpointed from the mora-tier angle other than from the CV-tier and X-tier angles.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdul-Sattar, Mohammed, Ahmed (1997). Elision in Standard English and Basrah Arabic. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. Basrah: University of Basrah.
Clements, George N. & Keyser, Samuel Jay (1983). CV phonology: A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Giegerich, H. J. (1992). English Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.
Goldsmith, J. A. (1976). Auto-segmental Phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics.
Gruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson’s Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold.
Gussenhoven, G. & Jacobs, Haike (2005). Understanding Phonology. London: Arnold.
Hammond, M. (1997). vowel quantity and syllabification in English. Linguistic Society of America, 73(1), 1-17.
Hayes, Bruce (1989). compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253–306.
Hogg, R. (1992). The Cambridge History of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hyman, L. M. (1975). Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.
Hyman, L. M. (1985). A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.
Itô, J. (1989). A prosodic theory of epenthesis. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory, 7, 217-259
katamba, F. (1989). An Introduction to Phonology. London: Longman.
Kreidler, C. W. (2004). The Pronunciation of English. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ladefoged, P. (2012). Vowels and Consonants: An Introduction to the Sounds of Languages. Oxford: Blackwell
Lass, R. (1984). Phonology: An Introduction to Basic Concepts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Levin, Juliette (1985). A metrical theory of syllabicity. PhD dissertation, MIT.
McCarthy, J. J. (2002). A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan (1990). Foot and word in prosodic morphology: The Arabic broken plural. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 8, 209–83.
Nespor, M & Vogel I. (2012). Prosodic Phonology. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
Ridouane, R. Hermes, Ann. & Hallé, Pierre. (2014). Tashlhiyt's ban of complex syllable onsets: phonetic and perceptual e3vidence. Language Typology and Universals, 67(1), 7-20
Zec, D. (1994). Sonority constraints on prosodic structure. New York: Garland.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies