Diverse ELT reading materials: Cross mapping gender ideas of respective readers

Ansa Hameed, Ismat Jabeen

Abstract


Textbooks including other academic factors play a crucial role in the gender construction process as highlighted by various researchers. However, there is less research to delve into the process. The present study is an attempt to explore the gender conceptions carried by the readers of two diverse varieties of English Language Teaching (ELT) materials produced by local and foreign publishers, in Pakistani academic settings. For the said purpose, a mixed-method research method has been used; whereas, the instruments of the study are a semantic differential score list and a semi open-ended interview. The population of the study is comprised of two groups of students at the elementary level from two different types of Pakistan schooling system i.e. Government sector and private sector, as they are using different types of ELT material. The results of the study reveal that students exposed to these two varieties of materials have a difference in their gender conceptions. There is an observable difference in the way readers of each set of books relate different attributes to each gender group. Further, the participants of the interview also agree that characters in the textbooks are more often relatable and acceptable for them in real life. The research to some extent agrees that gender ideas provided to young minds in their textbooks contribute to their psychological construction of gender along with other instruments; however, more research is still needed. Finally, it is suggested that the revision of textbooks concerning offered stereotypical gender ideologies can help to reduce gender disparity, to some extent. 


Keywords


gender; textbooks; ELT materials; students; semantic differential score list

Full Text:

PDF

References


Algeo, J. D. (1973). A Semantic Differential Measurement of Caregivers’ Attitudes towards the Alcoholic. Diss. Texas Tech University.

Andersdotter, S. H. (2005). Honourable or highly-sexed: Adjectival descriptions of male and female characters in Victorian and contemporary children’s fiction. Uppsala: Acta Upsaliensis Universitatis.

Basow, S. A. (1992). Gender Stereotypes and Roles. 3rd edition. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.

Bussey K, & Bandura A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review,106, 4, 676-685.

Clemans, K. H., DeRose, L. M., Graber, J. A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2010). Gender in adolescence: Applying a personin-context approach to gender identity and roles. In J. C. Chrisler & D. R. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology (pp. 527-558). NY: Springer.

Comeau, D. (2003). Teaching and gender perspectives in the English language arts classroom. EGALLERY: A Peer-reviewed Journal 8, 2.

Dean, L. (2007). Creating subjects for gender apartheid: A critical study of an English language Pakistani textbook. In Qureshi, R. & Jane, F. A. Rarieya (Eds.) Gender and Education in Pakistan, (170-193). Karachi: OUP.

Elliker, M. J. (2005). The importance of gender roles in children's literature. Unpublished master thesis, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Fenstermaker, S. and West, C., (2002), Doing difference revisited: problems, prospects, and the dialogue in feminist theory, in Fenstermaker, S. and West, C. (eds), Doing Gender, Doing Difference: Inequality, Power and Institutional Change. New York: Routledge.

Hameed, A. (2012). A Gender-Based Study of English Textbooks Produced by Punjab Textbook Board and Oxford University Press for Elementary Level. (Ph.D. Dissertation), Islamabad: National University of Modern Languages.

Johnson, J. L., Greaves, L., & Repta, R. (2007). Better science with sex and gender: A primer for health research. Vancouver, BC, Canada: Women’s Health Research Network.

Kubota, R. (2003). New approaches to gender, class, and race in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12: 31-47.

Lorber, J. (2005). Breaking the bowls: Degendering and feminist change. New York: Norton.

Mattu, A. & Hussain, N. (2004). Class and Gender in School Texts. In (Ed). The subtle subversion: the state of curricula and textbooks in Pakistan. Islamabad. Sustainable Development Policy Institute. 101-109.

Malszecki, G. & Cavar, T. (2005). Men, masculinities, war, and sport. In Race, Class, and Sexuality (4th Ed.). N. Mandell (Ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall: New York.

Mendoza, J., & Reese, D. (2001). Examining multicultural picture books for the early childhood classroom: Possibilities and pitfalls. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 3, 2, 1-38.

Reutler, M. (2013). How gender stereotypes are achieved linguistically in AMC’s Mad Men. Journal of Serial Narration on Television, 2. Saarland university.

Sovic, A. & Hus, V. (2015). Gender Stereotype Analysis of the textbooks for young learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 186 (2015) 495 – 501. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82566205.pdf

Sultan, R. S., Shah, N. & Fazal, A. (2019). Gender representation in public schools textbooks of Baluchistan. Pakistan Journal of Applied Social Sciences, 9, 55-70.

Tanaka, L. (2004). Gender, Language and Culture. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Taylor, F. (2003). Content analysis and gender stereotypes in children's books. Teaching Sociology, 31, 3, 200-311.

Waqar, S. & Ghani, M. (2019). Gender exclusions in textbooks: A comparative study of female representation in provincial ELT textbooks of Pakistan. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9, 5, 377-391.

Yonata, F. & Mujiyanto, Y. (2017). The representation of gender in English textbooks in Indonesia. Journal of Language and Literature 12(1): 91-101. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320707867_The_Representation_of_Gender_in_English_Textbooks_in_Indonesia


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies