The reproduction of the gothic motifs of Frankenstein in the COVID-19 journalistic discourse: A corpus-based critical discourse analysis approach
Abstract
The recent horrors of the COVID-19 pandemic have renewed interest in Gothic fiction in general and Mary Shelley's Frankenstein in particular. The image of Frankenstein has become associated with the COVID-19 discourses (e.g. literary, journalistic, medical, and social media) as reflected in the representation of the horrors of isolation and contagion. The influence of the novel is clearly reflected in literary, medical, scientific, and everyday discourses today. Despite the prolific literature on the representation of Gothic elements and motifs, reflections on Gothic motifs in the reproduction of COVID-19 discourse have not yet been elaborated. In light of this, the paper seeks to explore the manipulation and reproduction of Shelley’s Frankenstein in the COVID-19 journalistic discourse. A corpus of 542 editorials and opinion commentaries from 83 newspapers was built. The corpus included only editorials and opinions written in English. Corpus-based critical discourse analysis was used. The results indicate that the Gothic motifs of Frankenstein are manipulated and reproduced in the journalistic discourse of COVID-19 to depict the chaos and destruction caused by the enormously powerful and catastrophic virus/monster that has come to rule the world. The COVID-19 journalistic discourse based on the fictional image of Frankenstein represents a distinct discourse genre that manipulates Gothic motifs in the thematic representations of the horrors associated with the pandemic itself on the one hand, and the social, economic and political problems and crises that have shaken the stability of the entire world on the other. It can be concluded that this representation has been developed and generated from the interaction between the writers and the text of Frankenstein.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allan, R., & Buijs, M. (2007). The language of literature: Linguistic approaches to classical texts. Leiden: Brill.
Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
Baker, P. (2012). Contemporary corpus linguistics. London: Continuum International Publishing.
Baker, P., & McEnery, T. (2015). Corpora and discourse studies: Integrating discourse and corpora. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2015). The Cambridge handbook of English corpus linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buckley, C. A. G. (2016). Nomadic intertextuality and postmillennial children's Gothic fiction (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Lancaster University, Lancaster.
Buzwell, G. (2014). Mary Shelley, Frankenstein and the Villa Diodati Discovering Literature: Romantics & Victorians, Romanticism, The Gothic, The novel 1780–1832. Retrieved from https://www.bl.uk/romantics-and-victorians/articles/mary-shelley-frankenstein-and-the-villa-diodati#
Corstorphine, K., & Kremmel, L. R. (2018). The Palgrave handbook to horror literature. New York: Springer International Publishing.
Dunne, M. (2001). Intertextual encounters in American fiction, film, and popular culture. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press.
Edmundson, M. (2016). The Gothic tradition in Supernatural: Essays on the television series. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.
Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction. London: Vintage Books.
Garrett, P. (2018). Gothic reflections: Narrative force in nineteenth-century fiction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Geary, R. F. (1992). The Supernatural in Gothic fiction: Horror, belief, and literary change. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Graham, W. C. (1999). Gothic elements and religion in Nathaniel Hawthorne's fiction: Tectum-Verlag.
Grundmann, A. (2007). Intertextuality in Ken Russel's "Gothic": The representation of the Romantic Period and the motif of the artificial being. München, Germany: GRIN Verlag.
Hermansson, C. (2001). Reading feminist intertextuality through Bluebeard stories. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
Hogle, E. J. (2002). The Cambridge companion to Gothic fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Howard, J. (1994). Reading Gothic fiction: A Bakhtinian approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In T. Sebeok (Ed.), Style in language (pp. 351-449). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Johnson, B., Butler, J., & Felman, S. (2014). A Life with Mary Shelley. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
Kennedy, G. (2014). An introduction to corpus linguistics. London; New York: Routledge.
Louw, B., & Milojkovic, M. (2016). Corpus stylistics as contextual prosodic theory and subtext. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
McCarthy, M., & O’Keeffe, A. (2010). Historical perspective: What are corpora and how have they evolved? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 3-13). London; New York: Routledge.
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: Method, theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Mellor, A. K. (1988). Mary Shelley, her life, her fiction, her monsters. North Yorkshire: Methuen.
Meyer, C. F. (2002). English corpus linguistics: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Michelis, A. (2003). "Dirty Mamma": Horror, vampires, and the maternal in late nineteenth-century Gothic fiction. Critical Survey, 15(3), 5-22
Mulvey-Roberts, M. (1998). The handbook to Gothic literature. New York: New York University Press.
Peck, H. T. (1897). Harper's dictionary of classical literature and antiquities. New York: Harper.
Peer, W., Hakemulder, F., & Zyngier, S. (2012). Scientific methods for the humanities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Punter, D. (2014). The literature of terror: Volume 1: The Gothic tradition. London; New York: Routledge.
Punter, D. (2015). A new companion to the Gothic. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Raškauskienė, A. (2009). Gothic fiction: The beginnings. Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo Universitetas (VDU) Press.
Salama, A. (2021). A methodological synergy of dramatistic discourse analysis and corpus linguistics: From the discourse of US Presidents to Trump's 2016 Orlando speech. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(Special Issue 2), 752-772
Sampson, F. (2019). In search of Mary Shelley. xx: Pegasus Books.
Shelley, M. (1869). Frankenstein: Or, the modern Prometheus. Cambridge: Sever Francis & Co.
Snodgrass, M. E. (2014). Encyclopedia of Gothic literature. New York: Facts on File, Incorporated.
Thornbury, S. (2010). What can a corpus tell us about discourse? In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 270-287). London; New York: Routledge.
Ustabulut, M. Y., & Keskin, S. (2020). ‘Tele-education’ in the COVID-19 pandemic process in Turkey: A mental diaspora research specific to Turkish Language Teaching students. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 16(4), 2163-2182.
Walpole, H. (1764). The Castle of Otranto. London: Penguin.
Walpole, H. (1982). Preface to The Castle of Otranto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wisker, G. (2016). Contemporary women's Gothic fiction: Carnival, hauntings and vampire kisses. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Wright, A. (2007). Gothic fiction. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies