The pragmalinguistic character of intonation units in discourse
Abstract
Speech discourse is the communication between people, that is, the speaker seeks to influence the recipient in a conversation, using deep thoughts and meaningful words, expecting to receive a response from the addressee. In modern Kazakh linguistics, speech discourse is being explored in various ways as a reflection of people's relationships and actions. This research aims to study intonation of the text in the form of official radio interview and to reveal pragmalinguistic peculiarities of it. We used methods of audit, experimental and electro-acoustic analysis for this research. In the article, speech discourse is analyzed pragmalinguistically and its intonation features are investigated by experimental research. Consequently, we took unprepared speech for experimental research, where the participant of interview was informed about the topic of the conversation. However, despite the fact that the theme of the issue was given, the discourse in the form of a previously unprepared radio interview is provided as the subject of research. Among other findings, the results of the study showed that it is advisable to use appropriate pauses, especially the pauses of hesitation, while speaking.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Al-Eryani, A. A. (2007). Refusal strategies by Yemeni EFL learners. The Asian EFL Journal, 9(2), 19-34. https://asian-efl-journal.com/June_2007_EBook_editions.pdf#page=19
Amanbayeva, A., & Zhumabaeva, Zh. (2017). Creating speech synthesis using prosodic methods // peer-reviewed scientific journal Uneversium: philology and art history. – №8 (42).
Amanbayeva, A. Zh. (2012). Pragmalinguistic nature of intonation units (experimental phonetic research). – Almaty, 2012. – p. 176
ArabZouzani, M. A., Pahlavannejadb, M. R., & Seyyedi, H. (2019). The investigation of mood and modality in the first letter of Nahj al-Balagheh based on the interpersonal metafunction of Halliday’s systemic functional grammar. International Journal of New Trends in Social Sciences, 3(2), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijntss.v3i2.3817
Arutyunova, N. D. (1990). Discourse//Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary. М.: Sov. Encyclopedia, 136-137.
Astuti, D. A., & Chandra, O. H. (2021). Speech Acts and the Common Problems Involved in a Humor Text. Culturalistics: Journal of Cultural, Literary, and Linguistic Studies, 5(1), 65-72. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/culturalistics/article/view/11470
Baitursynov, A. (1992). Language lessons. Almaty: Ana tili, – p. 448
Bazarbaeva, Z. M. (2014). Intonation of Kazakh speech. – Lap Lambert Academic Iublishing. Saarbrucken. – p. 188.
Bazarbayeva, Z. M. (2016). Problems of segmental and supersegmental phonetics. – Almaty, 2016. – p. 746
Bazarbayeva, Z., Ospangazieva, N., Sadykova, R., Zhalalova, A., & Zhauynshiyeva, Z. (2018). Description of One-dimensional and Multi-dimensional Distinctive Features in the Kazakh Phonology. An Acad Bras Cienc, 90(1 Suppl 2).
Bazarbayeva, Z. M. (2008). Kazakh intonation – Almaty, Dayk-Press.
Bazarbayeva, Z. M. (2012). Basics of Kazakh phonology – Almaty. – p. 120
Bazarbayeva, Z. M., Zhalalova, A. M., & Ormakhanova, Y. N. (2015). Universal Properties of Intonation Components. Rev. Eur. Stud., 7, 226. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/rveurost7&div=200&id=&page=
Bazarbayeva, Z. M., Zhalalova, A. M., Ormakhanova, Y. N., Ospangaziyeva, N. B., & Karbozova, B. D. (2016). Intonational Division of a Speech Flow in the Kazakh Language. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(10), 3669-3678. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1114719
Bazarbayeva, Z., Zhunisbek, A., & Malbakov, M. (2014). Phonological foundations of the transition Kazakh alphabet to Latin graphics. Life Science Journal, 11(9), 147-150. http://www.lifesciencesite.com/lsj/life1109s/027_25142life1109s14_147_150.pdf
Bizakov, S. (2000). Dictionary of variants words. – Almaty: Bilim, 2000. – p. 320
Calandruccio, L., Porter, H. L., Leibold, L. J., & Buss, E. (2020). The clear-speech benefit for school-age children: speech-in-noise and speech-in-speech recognition. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(12), 4265-4276. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00353
Ciobanu, N. R. (2018). Language and language disorders. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(1), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v5i1.3473
Deacu, A., Kilyeni, S., & Barbulescu, C. (2018). Correction techniques for language disorders. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 292–299. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v10i3.1039
Farahani, M. V., & Kaleybar, N. M. (2019). Embracing an improved technique of analyzing Persian translations: A case study of waiting for Godot. International Journal of Current Innovations in Interdisiplinary Scientific Studies, 3(2), 16-27. https://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/IJ-CISS/article/view/5281
Gizdatov, G. G., & Sopiyeva, B. A. (2018). Discourse and identity in the medial space of Kazakhstan. Медиаобразование, (4). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/discourse-and-identity-in-the-medial-space-of-kazakhstan
Goikhman, O. Ya., & Nadezhdina, T. M. (1997). Basics of speech communication. – М.: – p. 269
Grushevskaya, T. G., Popkov V. D., & Sadokhin, A. P. (2003). Basics of intercultural communication. –М.: UNITI–DANA, 2003. – p. 352
Humboldt, W. (1999). On language: On the diversity of human language construction and its influence on the mental development of the human species. https://philpapers.org/rec/HUMOLO
Joudi, N. S. (2019). Gender leadership styles and linguistic practices: The case of Lebanese International University coordinators. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education, 6(2), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijire.v6i2.4362
Kavilova, T., Umrzoqova, G., & Inomov, U. (2020). Theory of the concept of speech act. Архив Научных Публикаций JSPI, 1-293. https://science.i-edu.uz/index.php/archive_jspi/article/view/3806
Khajayeva, Z., Stambekova, A., Gazikhanova, Z., Smagulova, G., & Makhanbetjanovna, S. R. (2021). Primary school teacher candidates’ views on multilingual concepts: A perspective of learning technology. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 13(1), 01–09. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v12i4.5184
Klyuev, Ye. V. (1998). Speech communication. – p. 224 Russian language and culture of speech. Under the editorship of Professor V.I. Maksimova – М.: 2000. – p. 411
Kondrateva, I., Sabirova, D., & Plotnikova, N. (2018). Subjectivity functions in reflexive and intercultural process of linguistic development. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 13(4), 529–536. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v13i4.3858
Korolyov, I., & Domylivska, L. (2020). Mentality and national character as semiotic regulators of communicative behavior. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 9(1), 354-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i1.2355
Kubieva, V., Sagiyeva, A., Sagiyeva, A., Salimgerey, Z., & Baiseitova, M. (2021). Multilingualism is a trend in the development of modern Kazakhstan. Global Journal of Sociology: Current Issues, 11(1), 40–44. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjs.v11i1.5480
Legas, A. M., & Mengistu, A. A. (2018). The practice and guidance and counseling in Amhara region Ethiopia. Global Journal of Guidance and Counseling in Schools: Current Perspectives, 8(3), 119–127. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjgc.v8i3.3605
Lukyanova, V., & Koloskova, O. (2020). Pragmatic potential of onomatopoeia in animated movies for children. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjflt.v10i1.4482
Lvov, M. R. (2000). Basics of speech theory. – М.. – p. 248
Madarova, S., & Garcia Laborda, J. (2020). Seven common misconceptions in bilingual education in primary education in Spain. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(2), 358–368. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v15i2.4605
Matzler, A. A. (1990). Pragmatics of communicative units. – Kishenev.: 1990. – p. 103
Mavasoglu, M. (2018). Readability, referential cohesion and interaction in texts of websites, textbooks and workbooks for French language learning. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(2), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v10i2.3419
Mguwata, T. (2020). Psychosocial challenges and coping strategies of caregivers with family members under palliative care in Mufakose, Zimbabwe. Global Journal of Psychology Research: New Trends and Issues, 10(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjpr.v10i2.4797
Minyar-Beloroucheva, A., Sergienko, P., Vishnyakova, E., & Vishnyakova, O. (2020). Semantic and cognitive communicative aspects of abbreviation in the modern English discourse varieties. International Journal of English Linguistics, 10(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v10n1p26
Mok, J. (2010). The new role of English language teachers: developing students’ critical thinking in Hong Kong secondary school classrooms. The Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 12(2), 262-287. http://70.40.196.162/PDF/June-2010.pdf#page=262
Natividad, M. R. A., & Batang, B. L. (2018). Students' Perceptual Learning Styles and Attitudes toward Communicative Language Teaching. TESOL International Journal, 13(4), 104-120. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1244108
Posner, R. (2019). Syntactics, Semantics, and Pragmatics Revisited half a Century after their Introduction by Charles W. Morris. In Signs of Humanity/L’homme et ses signes, (pp. 1349-1354). De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110854572-168
Theodorou, P., & Meliones, A. (2019). Developing apps for people with sensory disabilities, and implications for technology acceptance models. Global Journal of Information Technology: Emerging Technologies, 9(2), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.18844/gjit.v9i2.4431
Uzunboylu, H., Hürsen, Ç., Özütürk, G., & Demirok, M. (2015). Determination of Turkish University students’ attitudes for mobile integrated EFL classrooms in North Cyprus and scale development: ELLMTAS. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 21(10), 1283-1296 https://doi.org/10.3217/jucs-021-10-1283
Vygotsky L.S. (1934). Thinking and Speech // Psychological Research. – М. – p. 325
Yeldham, M. (2018). Viewing L2 captioned videos: what's in it for the listener?. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 367-389. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1406956
Zand-Moghadam, A., & Adeh, A. (2020). Investigating pragmatic competence, metapragmatic awareness and speech act strategies among Turkmen-Persian bilingual and Persian monolingual EFL learners: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 49(1), 22-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17475759.2019.1705876
Zhumanbekova, N. Z., Bentyaa, Y. V., & Dzharbulova, A. (2018). The figurative idioms of English, German and Kazakh in contrast. Contemporary Educational Researches Journal, 8(3), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.18844/cerj.v8i3.589
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies