Students' attitudes towards learning English grammar: A study of scale development
Abstract
Learning a language means not only studying four skills of proficiency, but also understanding the system of rules underlying. In this respect, learners’ attitudes towards grammar are also of vital importance. The main objective of this descriptive study is to determine English language learners’ attitudes towards grammar and to analyze these attitudes in the framework of several variables (gender, age, faculty, time spent on learning English, and proficiency level). The data were collected from 293 students who have English language education in preparatory school of Anadolu University in six different proficiency levels (beginner, elementary, pre-intermediate, intermediate, upper-intermediate, pre-faculty) during 2014-2015 spring semester. The scale designed by the researchers to investigate the attitudes of learners towards learning grammar was determined as a reliable and valid tool including two factors. The analyses revealed that gender, age, time spent on learning English, and proficiency level variables did not create significant differences in the attitudes (p>.05) The only variable which created significant difference in the attitudes of learners was the faculties of students, and this was observed in the “Positive Attitude and Contribution†factor of the scale (p<.05). The results of the study indicated that students in faculties like Science, Humanities, Education, and Engineering have more positive attitudes towards learning grammar than Economics, Business Administration, and Communication faculty students. Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acat, B., & Demiral, S. (2002). Türkiyede yabancı dil öğreniminde motivasyon kaynakları ve sorunları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 8(3), pp.312-329. Retrieved from http://www.kuey.net/index.php/kuey/issue/view/31
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1984). The effect of sampling error on convergence, improper solutions, and goodness of fit ındices for maximum likelihood confirmatory factor analysis. Psychometrika, 49, 155–73. doi: 10.1007/BF02294170
Bentler P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107 (2), 238–246. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: a literature review. Language Awareness, 12(2), 96–108. doi: 10.1080/09658410308667069
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indexes for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24 (4), 445–55. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara:Pegema Yayıncılık
Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. E. (2013). Psikolojik test ve değerlendirme, testler ve ölçmeye giriş [Psychological testing and assessment, an introduction of test and measurement] E. Tavşancıl (Ed. & Trans.). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Orlando, FL: CBS Collage Publishers Canpany.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
DeVellis, R. F. (2014). Ölçek Geliştirme, Kuram ve Uygulamalar (Ed. Tarık Totan). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Doğan, İ. ve Doğan, N. (2014). Adım Adım Çözümlü Parametrik Olmayan İstatistiksel Yöntemler. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40264512
Enginarlar, H., İnan, M., Akın, N., Aydın, N., Başçavuşoğlu, A., Orhon, G., & Başçı, E. (1983, June). Yabancı Dil Öğretiminde Karşılaşılan Başlıca Sorunlarımız Nelerdir? In M. Adem (Chair), Orta öğretim kurumlarında yabancı dil öğretimi ve sorunları. Panel conducted at the meeting of Türk Eğitim Derneği, Ankara, Turkey.
Green, S. B., & Salkind, N. J. (2008). Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh (Analyzing and Understanding Data–Fifth Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
Hu L. T., & Bentler P.M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit ındexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1(6), 1-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Işık, A. (2008). Yabancı Dil Eğitimimizdeki Yanlışlar Nereden Kaynaklanıyor? Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 4(2), pp.15. Retrieved from http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/jlls/article/view/5000084181
İncecay, V. & Dollar, Y.K. (2011). Foreign language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3394–3398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.307
Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1993). Lisrel 8: Structural Equation Modeling With the Simplis Command Language. Hillsdale: Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Kirkgöz, Y. (2009). Globalization and English language policy in Turkey. Educational Policy, 23(5), 663-684. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904808316319
Kline, R.B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Pergamon.
Lightbown, P. (1991). What have we here? Some observations on the effect of instruction on L2 learning. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds.), Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 197–212). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
Loewen, S., Li, S., Fei, F., Thompson, A., Nakatsukasa, K., Ahn, S., & Chen, X. (2009), Second Language Learners' Beliefs About Grammar Instruction and Error Correction. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 91–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00830.x
Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R. ve McDonald, R. P. (1988). Goodness-of-fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychological Bulletin, 3(103), 391-410.
Özdamar, K. (2013). Paket Programlar ile İstatistiksel Veri Analizi (9. Baskı). Eskişehir: Nisan Kitabevi..
Schulz, R. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. The Modern Language Journal, 85(2), 244-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00107
Şeker, H., & Gençdoğan, B. (2014). Psikolojide ve Eğitimde Ölçme Aracı Geliştirme. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Siegel, S. (1977). Davranış bilimleri için parametrik olmayan istatistikler (Ed. Yurdal Topsever). Ankara Üniversitesi, Dil ve Tarih–Coğrafya Fakültesi Yayınları. No: 274. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi
Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 83, 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00002
Sümbüloğlu K. & Akdağ B. (2009). İleri biyoistatistiksel yöntemler.Ankara: Hatipoğlu.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel kavramlar ve örnek uygulamalar. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 6(3), 49-73.
Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş: Temel ilkeler ve LISREL uygulamaları. İstanbul: Ekinoks Yayınları
Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Vieira A.L. (2011). Preparation of the analysis. Interactive LISREL in practice. London: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18044-6
Zhou, A. A. (2009). What adult ESL learners say about improving grammar and vocabulary in their writing for academic purposes. Language Awareness, 18(1), 31-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09658410802307923
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies