Myth And History In Amitav Ghosh’s The Circle Of Reason
Abstract
The Novel The Circle of Reason (1986) is a unique combination of myth and history. Myth mediates the immediate temporality. Myth offers itself to subversion to highlight contemporary socio-cultural history. However, the fictitious element, if not a dominant one plays equally an important role to present actuality. The text embodies the concept of new-historicism which defines the literary work as producing representations of reality into an imaginary object. According to this concept, the text is ‘over determining’ in nature and it is a product of certain signifying practices, whose source and referent is history itself. The literary work is the product of a certain Produced representation of reality into an imaginary Object. ‘The textual real’ is related to the historical reality, not as an imaginary transposition of it, but as the product of certain signifying practices, whose source and referent is, in the last instance history itself.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anand, Mulk Raj, The King Emperor’s English, Bombay: Hind Kitab, 1948.
Anandavardana, “Udyota III” Dhvanyaloka qtd. in “The Function of Criticism” in K. Chandrashekaran ed. Culture and Creativity, Madras : Macmillan company Ltd., 1969.
Barthes, Roland, “Science versus Literature”, The Times Literary Supplement, 28 (Sept. 1967).
Belsey Catherine, “Postmodern Love: Questioning the Metaphysics of Desire”, New Literary History. 25.3 (Summer 1994).
Benjamin, Walter, “The Author as Producer”, Understanding Bretcht trans. Anna Bostock London, 1973.
Caudwell, Christopher, “English Poets: The Decline of Capitalism”, Illusion and Reality London, 1946.
Coward, Rosalind and John Ellis, ‘S/z’ in Language and Materialism: Developments in Semiology and Theory of the Subject. London, 1977.
De Man, Paul, “The Resistance to Theory”, Yale French Studies 63 (1982) .
Devy, G.N., “The Conventions of Literary History in India : The Two Paradigms”, New Quest 114 (Nov./Dec. 1995).
Dubuffet, qtd. in Pillai, A.S.D., “A Sociological perspective-cum-ideological Implications” in Postmodernism : An Introduction Tiruchirapally : Paul Printers, 1919.
Eagleton, Terry, “Towards a Science of the Text”, Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory, London, 1976.
Fiedler, Leslie, What was the Death of the Novel? New Delhi : USIS, 1982 qtd. A.S.D Pillai,
Fischlim, Daniel, “Eduardo Galeano and the Politics of Style” ARIEL, 24.4 (Oct. 93)
Frye, Northrop, “Archetypal Criticism: Theory of Myths” in Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays. Princeton : New Jersey, 1982
Ghosh, Amitav. The Circle of Reason (New Delhi: Penguin Books India and Ravi Dayal,) 2008.
Jauss Hans, Robert, “Literary History as a Challenge of Literary Theory” in Towards an Aesthetic of Reception, trans. Timothi Brennan, Brighton, 1982.
Mukherjee, Meenakshi, “Myth as Technique” in Twice Born Fiction. New Delhi: Heinemann, 1974.
Rushdie, Saiman, Midnight’s Children London: Picador, 1981.
Shashi Tharoor, The Great Indian Novel (New Delhi: Penguin Books, 1989).
Shyamala A. Narayanan, Indian English literature 1980-2000: A Critical Survey (New Delhi: Pencraft International, 2004).
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies