Do ELT coursebooks still suffer from gender inequalities? A case study from Turkey

Yusuf Demir, Mustafa Yavuz


Gender discrimination is still a hot debate running in the periphery of education. One way it is imposed on students is through printed materials and coursebooks, particularly those used for foreign language teaching given their linguistic content and content-based nature. This study seeks to investigate gender representations in an ELT coursebook series Yes You Can, published by the Turkish Ministry of Education for public high schools in Turkey. The study draws on nine different categories in order to reveal the gender-biased components in the coursebook from multiple perspectives, if any. Analyses were conducted on both verbal and pictorial contents on a page-by-page basis. Descriptive statistiscs were used to describe the numerical data and chi-square tests were conducted to test significance between the observed and expected values. It was found that, for the most part, there were not indications of gender inequality throughout the coursebook series. The findings are promising in terms of reflecting a fair representation of males and females, offering a glimmer of hope for the new-generation ELT coursebooks. Suggestions are made for coursebook writers and further research.


ELT coursebooks; gender equality; gender discrimination; gender representation; gender stereotypes

Full Text:



Amini, M., & Birjandi, P. (2012). Gender bias in the Iranian high school EFL textbooks. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 134-147.

Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2003). Subliminal sexism in current ESL/EFL textbooks. Asian EFL Journal, 5, 200-241.

Arikan, A. (2005). Age, gender and social class in ELT coursebooks: A critical study. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28, 29-39.

Arslan, Ş. A. (2000). Ders kitaplarında cinsiyetçilik. T.C. Başbakanlık Kadının Statüsü ve Sorunları Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları.

Bahman, M., & Rahimi, A. (2010). Gender representation in EFL materials: An analysis of English textbooks of Iranian high schools.

Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 273-277.

Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.

Boster, M.A. (2005). Gender equity of traditional and non-traditional career roles in Newbery award-winning and honor books. Doctoral Dissertation, Liberty University.

Bowen, A. G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106, 676-713.

Cameron, D. (1985). Feminism and linguistic theory. Great Britain: The Macmillan Press Ltd.

Carroll, D., & Kowitz, J. (1994). Using concordancing techniques to study gender stereotyping in ELT textbooks. In J. Sunderland (ed.), Exploring gender: Questions and implications for English language education. Hemel Hempstead: Prentice Hall.

Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Çak, Ş. E. (2010). Toplumsal Cinsiyet ve Feminizm Teorileri Bağlamında Türkiye’deki Reklam Filmleri ve Popüler Müzik Videoları. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesi Dergisi (Yedi), 4, 101-110.

Çubukçu, H., & Sivaslıgil, P. (2007). Sexism in English language textbooks. Çukurova University Journal of Education, 3(34), 25-32.

Desprez-Bouanchaub, A., Doolaege, J., & Ruprecht, L. (1999). Guidelines for a gender neutral language (3rd ed.)UNESCO Workshops. Google Books.

Diktaş, M. (2011). Gender representations in EFL coursebooks. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Antalya, Turkey

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Gender and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.

Garland-Thomson, R. (2002). Integrating disability, transforming feminist theory. National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 14(3), 1-32.

Gharbavi, A., & Mousavi, S.A. (2012). A Content analysis of textbooks: Investigating gender bias as a social prominence in Iranian high school English textbooks. English Linguistics Research, 1(1), 42-49.

Graci, J. P. (1989). Are foreign language textbooks sexist? Exploration of models of evaluation. Foreign Language Annals, 22, 77-86.

Gupta, A. F., & Lee, A. S. Y. (1990). Gender representation in English textbooks used in the Singapore primary schools. Language and Education, 4, 29-50.

Hamdan, S. (2010). English-language textbooks reflect gender bias: A case study in Jordan. Advances in Gender and Education, 2, 22-26.

Hartman, P. L., & Judd, E. L. (1978). Sexism and TESOL materials. TESOL Quarterly, 12(4), 383-393.

Helvacıoğlu, F. (1996). Ders Kitaplarında Cinsiyetçilik 1928-1995. Kaynak Yayınları.

Holmqvist, P., & Gjörup, L. (2006). The representation of gender and gender roles in English textbooks. Dissertation, Malmö Högskola.

Mills, S. (1995). Feminist stylistic. London: Routledge.

Mineshima, M. (2008). Gender representations in an EFL textbook. Bulletin of Niigata Institute of Technology, 13. Retrieved on February 13, 2016 from:

Mkuchu, S. G. V. (2004). Gender roles in textbooks as a function of hidden curriculum in Tanzania primary schools. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Africa.

Mose, N. (2013). Use of gender-exclusive language in secondary school English textbooks in Kenya: The case of New Integrated English Student’s book. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(19), 99-105.

Mukundan, J., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2008). Gender representation in Malaysian secondary school English language textbooks. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 155-173.

Otlowski, M. (2003). Ethnic diversity and gender bias in EFL textbooks. Asian EFL Journal, 5(3), 1-15.

Porreca, K. L. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 18(4), 704-724.

Poulou, S. (1997). Sexism in the discourse roles of textbook dialogues. Language Learner Journal, 15, 68-73.

Sakita, T. I. (1995). Sexism in Japanese English education: A survey of EFL texts. Woman and Language, 18, 5-12.

Sandelowski, M. (2003). Tables or tableaux? The challenges of writing and reading mixed methods studies. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 321-350). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

SEÇBİR (2012). Ders kitaplarında toplumsal cinsiyet: İyileşmeler, problemler, öneriler. Retrieved on September 17, 2015 from:

Sivaslıgil, P. (2006). Gender ideology in 6th, 7th and 8th grade coursebooks published by the Turkish Ministry of National Education. Master’s thesis, Çukurova University, Turkey

UNICEF (2003). Eğitimin toplumsal cinsiyet açısından incelenmesi, Türkiye 2003 (11). Retrieved on April 5, 2016 from:

USDL Women’s Bureau (2010). Nontraditional occupations for women in 2009. Retrieved on May 22, 2015 from:

Women in Literacy and Life Assembly (2002). Guidelines for gender-fair use of language. Retrieved on May 23, 2016 from:

Xiaoping, Y. (2005). Gender representation in textbooks: A case study of three English reading textbooks. Journal of Southeast Asian Education, 5(1-2), 85-93.

Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2003). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Yılmaz, E. (2012). Gender representations in ELT coursebooks: A comparative study. Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University, Turkey


  • There are currently no refbacks.

  Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2017 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies