Institution’s title and shibboleth: a construct of grammatical relationship in advertising plates

Taofeek Olaiwola Dalamu


     Institutions are known through the names-cum-titles shown on their signboards, internet websites, letterheads, etc. However, it seems that such cultures could not satisfy the yearning of most organizations. So, they further propagate   their core values and traits by constructing short linguistic bursts-cum-contents that can expatiate on what the institutions really stand for and what the consumers situate to gain. This study has explained selected institution’s shibboleths that serve as convincing phrases in order to facilitate the audience’s patronage. The grammatical rank sequence is employed to analyze the catchword. Nominal group and their complexes are observed as prioritized structures deployed to influence consumers. The study characterizes its socio-economic benefits to humanity thus: (i) it shows that institutions are desperate in differentiating their products one from another through linguistic clichés; (ii) it creates awareness for consumers to make a reliable product among the numerous ones in the market; (iii) it indicates the level of language constructs and choices that advertisers can coin to sell their ideas to consumers; (iv) it reveals the value that institutions place on words to influence consumers; (v) it enhances competitiveness that will propel institutions to produce quality products; (vi) it boosts sales and market share; and (vii) it could pave way for new firms to fashion their clichés in new grand styles, having obtained the knowledge of some institutions’ shibboleths. Beside viewing shibboleths as a mark of exalting consumers as kings; it compels linguists to investigate the dynamisms in the lexemic constructs of advertising professionals.


Audience; branding; differentiation; grammatical rank scale; shibboleth

Full Text:



Anderson, S. (1988). Morphological theory. Linguistic theory foundation, 1, 146-191.

Ang, I. (1991). Desperately seeking the audience.

Awonusi, V. O. (2007). Good spoken English and national development: Sociophonological in the

service of man. Akoka, Yaba: university of Lagos Press.

Bermu´dez-Otero, R. and Honeybone, P. (2006). Phonology and syntax: a shifting relationship. Lingua

, 543–561.

Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (2004). The Functional Analysis of English. Great Britain: Hodder Arnold.

Bogart, L. (1996). Strategy in advertising. Chicago: NTC Books.

Butler, C. S. (2003a). Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories

Part I. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

--- (2003b). Structure and Function: A Guide to Three Major Structural-Functional Theories

Part II. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Chomsky, N. (1972). Language and mind. Harcourt, Brace: Jovanovich.

Clark, J. & Yallop, C. (1995). An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Victoria, Australia:

Blackwell Publishing.

Cook, G. (2001). The Discourse of Advertising. New York: Routledge.

Dik, C. (1978). Functional Grammar. Amsterdam: North Holland.

Dyer, G. (2005) Advertising as communication. London: Routledge.

Eggins, S. (2004). Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. London: Continuum.

Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. & Hymas, N. (2003). An Introduction to Language. Boston, Massachusetts:

Heinle, Thomson.

Gaddol, D. (2006). The Semiotic Construction of a Wine Label. The Discourse Reader, 194-203.

Halliday, M. A K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Great Britain: Arnold.

--- & Matthiessen M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. Great Britain:

Hodder Arnold.

Harris, R. & Seldon, A. (1962). Advertising and the public. London: Andre Deutsch.

Hoey, M. P. (2000). Textual interaction. London: Routledge.

Jackson, H. & Ze Amvela, E. (2000). Words, meaning and vocabulary: An introduction to modern

English lexicology. London: Continuum

Jefkins, F. & Yadin, D. (2000). Advertising. England: Pearson Educational Limited.

Jobber, D. (2004). Principles and practice of marketing. Maiden Beckshire: McGraw Hill Education.

Kotler, P. (2003). Marketing management. India: Pearson Eduction, Inc.

Leech, G. (1966). English in advertising: A linguistic study of advertising in Great Britain. London:


Leymore, L. (1975). The hidden myth. London: Heinemann.

Malmkjaer, K. (2004)(Ed.). The Linguistics Encydopedia London: Routledge.

McGregor, W. B. (1997). Semiotic Grammar. London and New York: oxford University Press.

Mittell, J. (2006). Narrative Complexity in Contemporary American Television. The Velvet Light Trap,

, 29-40.

Napoli, D. (1996). Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ogilvy, D. (2013). Confession of an advertising man. Harpenden: Southbank Publishing.

Pullum, G. & Zwicky, A. (1988). Morphological theory. Linguistic theory foundation, 1, 255-280

Ravelli, L. (2000). Getting started with functional analysis of texts. Researching Language in schools and

communities, l, 27 - 63.

Richards, J., Platt, J. & Weber, H. (1997). Longman dictionary of applied linguistics London: Longman.

Schultz, D. & Barnes, B. (1995). Strategic advertising campaings. Lincolnwood, IL:NTC Books.

Strong, J. (2001). The new Strong’s expanded exclusive concordance of the Bible. Nashville, Tennessee:

Thomas Nelson Inc.

Tetlock, P., Skitka, L. & Boettger, B (1989). Social and Cognitive Strategies for Coping With

Accountability: Conformity, Complexity and Bolstering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, (4), 632-640

Thompson, G. (2004). Introducing functional grammar. Great Britain: Hodder Arnold.

Van Dijk, T. A. (2008). Discourse and power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

--- (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. California: SAGE Publications Inc.

Van Valin, D. Jr. & LaPolla (1997). Syntax: Structural meaning and function. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press

Yule, G. (1985). The study of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zaidel, D. W., Bava, S. & Reis V.A. (2003). Relationship between asymmentry of the face and judging

trustworthiness in faces. LITERALITY, 8(3), 225-232.

Internet Resources

Caricato, A. (1999). Visuals for Speaking Presentations: An Analysis of the Presenter’s Perspective of

Audience as a Partner in Visual Design. Applied Research. Retrieved on November 3, 2016

Chandler, D. (2012). Semiotics for Beginners. Retrieved on January 22, 2012 from

www.aber, semiotic.html.

Cheshire, J., Kerswill, P. & Williams, A. (n.d.). On the non-convergence of phonology, grammar and

discourse. Retrieved on March 12, 2015 from

Dirisu, J, Iyiola, O. & Ibidunni, S. (2013). Product differentiation: a tool of competitive advantage and

optimal organizational performance: A study of Unilever Nigeria Plc. European Scientific,

,(34). Retrieved on September 12, 2015 from

Fey, M., Cleave, P., Ravida, A., Long,S. Dejmal, A., & Easton, D. (1994). Effects of grammar

facilitation on the phonological performance of children with speech and language impairments. J Speech Hear Res. 37(3), 594-607. Retrieved on September 12, 2015 from

Haarla, A. (2003). Product differentiation and welfare. American economic association, 66 (2). Retrieved

on September 12, 2013 from

Kompanets, L. (n.d.). Biometrics of Asymmetrical Face. Retrieved on September 12, 2015 from

Liu, Y., Weavera, R., Schmidtb, K., Serbana, N. & Cohnb, J. (2001). Facial Asymmetry: A New

Biometric. Retrieved on September 12, 2015 from

Livingstone, S. (2004). The challenging of changing audiences: or, what is the researcher to do in the age

of the internet? LSE Research Online. Retrieved on November 3, 2016 from

Marwala, T. & Hurwitz, E. (2015). Artificial Intelligence and Asymmetric Information Theory.

Retrieved on September 21, 2016 from

Post, M. (n.d.) The phonology and grammar of Galo “words”. Retrieved on February 2, 2015 from

Soberman, D. (2005). The complexity of media planning today. The Complexity of Market today.

Retrieved on June 24 2014 from


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies