The wh-adverbial & which-NP construction asymmetry within island structures in Turkish

Sinan Çakır

Abstract


The present study is a follow-up study of Çakır (2016b) which focused on the adverbial & which NP constructions asymmetry within island structures in Turkish. The characteristics of wh-adverbial nasıl “how” is compared with the which-NP constructions hangi şekilde “in what way” and hangi halde “in what condition”. The island constraints that are focused on in the study are Complex NP Constraint, Sentential Subject Constraint and Adjunct Island Constraint. The data have been collected through a Self-Paced Reading Task, a Grammaticality Judgment Test and a Multiple Choice Test from 297 participants. The findings of the present study are consistent with the ones obtained in the previous one. It seems that the wh-operators whose wh-phrases include nominal elements in their structures can license the lower CP with [+wh] feature through spec-head agreement while the operators of the single-word wh-adverbials cannot do the same thing.


Keywords


generative syntax; island constraints; wh-movement; wh-adjuncts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Akar, D. (1990). Wh-questions in Turkish. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Aoun, J., and Li, Y, A. (1993). Wh-elements in-situ: syntax or LF? Linguistic Inquiry, 24 (2): 199-238.

Arslan, C. (1999). Approaches to wh-structures in Turkish. Unpublished MA thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Cheng, L. (1997). On the Typology of Wh-Questions, Outstanding dissertations in linguistics series, New York: Garland Publishing.

Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (Eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. (pp. 232-286). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

X (2015). Island constraints in Turkish: A Grammaticality Judgment Study. In D. Zeyrek, Ç. Sağın Şimşek, U. Ataş and J. Rehbein (Eds.) Ankara Papers in Turkish and Turkic Linguistics. (pp. 68-76). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.

X (2016a). Island constraints and adjunct & argument asymmetry in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12 (29): 1-15.

X (2016b). The variability in the interpretation of different types of wh-adjuncts within island structures in Turkish. Journal of International Social Research, 9 (46): 48-57.

Çele, F., and Gürel, A. (2011). L2 acquisition of wh-extractions via a [-wh-movement] L1. In J. Herschensohn & D. Tanner (Eds.). In the proceedings of the 11th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 30-44). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Görgülü, E. (2006). Variable wh-words in Turkish. Unpublished MA thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.

İşsever, S. (2009). A syntactic account of wh-in-situ in Turkish. In S. Ay, Ö. Aydın, İ. Ergenç, S. Gökmen, S. İşsever and D. Peçenek (Eds.). Essays on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 103-112). Harrasowitz, Verlag.

Kiparsky, P., and Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In M. Bierwisch & K. Heidolph (Eds.). In Progress in Linguistics. (pp. 143-173). The Hague: Mouton.

Kornfilt, J. (2003). Unmasking the Sentential Subject Constraint in Turkish. In A.S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu Demiralp, E.E. Erguvanlı Taylan and A. Aksu Koç (Eds.). Studies in Turkish Linguistics (pp. 95-105). İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.

Kornfilt, J. (2008). Some Observations on Turkish/Turkic RCs. Paper presented at Leipzig Spring School on Linguistic Diversity; MPI-EVA Conference, Leipzig.

Munn, A. (2007).Island constraints. Retrieved on August, 2016 from https://www.msu.edu/course/lin/ 434/PSets/island-constraints.pdf

Özsoy, S. (1996). A’ dependencies in Turkish. Paper presented at the VI. Turkish Linguistics Conference; the School of Oriental and African Studies, London.

Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved on July, 2016 from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15166.

Ross, H. (1984). Inner islands. In C. Brugman & M. Macauley (Eds.). Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. (pp.258-265). Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley.

Schafer, R. (1995). Negation and verb second in Breton. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory, 13. 135-172.

Uzun, N. E. (2000). Anaçizgileriyle evrensel dilbilgisi ve Türkçe. İstanbul: Multilingual.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies