The wh-adverbial & which-NP construction asymmetry within island structures in Turkish

Sinan Çakır

Abstract


The present study is a follow-up study of Çakır (2016b) which focused on the adverbial & which NP constructions asymmetry within island structures in Turkish. The characteristics of wh-adverbial nasıl “how†is compared with the which-NP constructions hangi ÅŸekilde “in what way†and hangi halde “in what conditionâ€. The island constraints that are focused on in the study are Complex NP Constraint, Sentential Subject Constraint and Adjunct Island Constraint. The data have been collected through a Self-Paced Reading Task, a Grammaticality Judgment Test and a Multiple Choice Test from 297 participants. The findings of the present study are consistent with the ones obtained in the previous one. It seems that the wh-operators whose wh-phrases include nominal elements in their structures can license the lower CP with [+wh] feature through spec-head agreement while the operators of the single-word wh-adverbials cannot do the same thing.


Keywords


generative syntax; island constraints; wh-movement; wh-adjuncts

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Akar, D. (1990). Wh-questions in Turkish. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Aoun, J., and Li, Y, A. (1993). Wh-elements in-situ: syntax or LF? Linguistic Inquiry, 24 (2): 199-238.

Arslan, C. (1999). Approaches to wh-structures in Turkish. Unpublished MA thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.

Cheng, L. (1997). On the Typology of Wh-Questions, Outstanding dissertations in linguistics series, New York: Garland Publishing.

Chomsky, N. (1973). Conditions on transformations. In S. Anderson and P. Kiparsky (Eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. (pp. 232-286). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.

X (2015). Island constraints in Turkish: A Grammaticality Judgment Study. In D. Zeyrek, Ç. Sağın Şimşek, U. Ataş and J. Rehbein (Eds.) Ankara Papers in Turkish and Turkic Linguistics. (pp. 68-76). Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.

X (2016a). Island constraints and adjunct & argument asymmetry in Turkish. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12 (29): 1-15.

X (2016b). The variability in the interpretation of different types of wh-adjuncts within island structures in Turkish. Journal of International Social Research, 9 (46): 48-57.

Çele, F., and Gürel, A. (2011). L2 acquisition of wh-extractions via a [-wh-movement] L1. In J. Herschensohn & D. Tanner (Eds.). In the proceedings of the 11th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (pp. 30-44). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Görgülü, E. (2006). Variable wh-words in Turkish. Unpublished MA thesis, Boğaziçi University, İstanbul, Turkey.

İşsever, S. (2009). A syntactic account of wh-in-situ in Turkish. In S. Ay, Ö. Aydın, İ. Ergenç, S. Gökmen, S. İşsever and D. Peçenek (Eds.). Essays on Turkish Linguistics (pp. 103-112). Harrasowitz, Verlag.

Kiparsky, P., and Kiparsky, C. (1970). Fact. In M. Bierwisch & K. Heidolph (Eds.). In Progress in Linguistics. (pp. 143-173). The Hague: Mouton.

Kornfilt, J. (2003). Unmasking the Sentential Subject Constraint in Turkish. In A.S. Özsoy, D. Akar, M. Nakipoğlu Demiralp, E.E. Erguvanlı Taylan and A. Aksu Koç (Eds.). Studies in Turkish Linguistics (pp. 95-105). İstanbul: Boğaziçi University Press.

Kornfilt, J. (2008). Some Observations on Turkish/Turkic RCs. Paper presented at Leipzig Spring School on Linguistic Diversity; MPI-EVA Conference, Leipzig.

Munn, A. (2007).Island constraints. Retrieved on August, 2016 from https://www.msu.edu/course/lin/ 434/PSets/island-constraints.pdf

Özsoy, S. (1996). A’ dependencies in Turkish. Paper presented at the VI. Turkish Linguistics Conference; the School of Oriental and African Studies, London.

Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved on July, 2016 from http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/15166.

Ross, H. (1984). Inner islands. In C. Brugman & M. Macauley (Eds.). Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. (pp.258-265). Berkeley Linguistics Society, University of California, Berkeley.

Schafer, R. (1995). Negation and verb second in Breton. Natural Language & Linguistics Theory, 13. 135-172.

Uzun, N. E. (2000). Anaçizgileriyle evrensel dilbilgisi ve Türkçe. İstanbul: Multilingual.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies