A Comparative Look into How to Measure the Effectiveness of Vocabulary Learning Strategies: Through Using Percentages or Correlation Coefficients

İsmail Hakkı Erten, Marion Williams

Abstract


This study aims to compare the appropriateness of two statistical procedures for measuring the effectiveness of vocabulary learning strategies: percentages and correlation coefficients. To do this a group of 20 learners of English were asked to study 12 words in a written list, with their pronunciations, dictionary definitions, and example sentences. Data was collected through introspection where students were asked to verbalize their mental processes as they studied the target words. A pre-test and post-test were given to measure the task achievement. The qualitative data was transcribed verbatim and content-analysed for tokens of strategy use as well as by noting whether each use of strategies led to successful recall of the words on which they were used. To calculate the strategy effectiveness, both simple percentage calculation and correlation coefficients were employed for comparison. The findings indicated that percentage calculation can give a more realistic picture of strategy effectiveness than correlation coefficients.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, M. O. (1989). Vocabulary learning strategies. In Meara, P. (1989) Beyond words. London: CILT.

Bacon, S. M. & Finnemann, M. (1992). Sex differences in self-reported beliefs about foreign-language learning and authentic oral and written input. Language Learning, 42 (4), 471-495.

Brown, J. D. (1988) Understanding research in second language learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, T. S. &. Perry, F. L. Jr (1991). A comparison of three learning strategies for ESL vocabulary acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 25 (1), 17-32

Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers, Boston, Mass.: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Cohen, A. D. & Aphek, E. (1981). Easifying second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3 (2), 221-236.

Craik, F. I. M. & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268-294.

Ellis, N. & Beaton, A. (1993). Factors affecting the learning of foreign language vocabulary: Imagery keyword mediators and phonological short-term memory. The Quarterly journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A (3), 533-558.

Erten, I. H. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies: do our learning styles affect the way we use them? Paper presented at 31st IATEFL Conference, 2-5 April 1997, Brighton, UK.

Erten, I. H. (1988). Vocabulary learning strategies: An investigation into the effect of perceptual learning styles and modality of word presentation on the use of vocabulary learning strategies. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Exeter, School of Education, UK.

Fan, M. Y. (2003). Frequency of use, perceived usefulness, and actual usefulness of vocabulary learning strategies: A study of Hong Kong learners. The Modern Language Journal, 87 (2), 222-241.

Gu, Y. & Johnson, R. K (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46 (4), 643-679.

Hatch, E. & Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston, Mass.: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Lawson, M. J. & Hogben, D. (1996). The vocabulary-learning strategies of Foreign-language students. Language Learning, 46 (1), 101-135.

Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Boston, Mass.: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nyikos, M. (1990). Sex-related differences in adult language learning: socialization and memory factors. The Modern Language Journal, 74 (3), 273-287.

O'Malley, M. & Chamot, A. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle.

Porte, G. (1998). Poor language learners and their strategies for dealing with new vocabulary. ELT Journal, 42, 167-172.

Schmitt, N. & Schmitt, D. R. (1993). Identifying and assessing vocabulary learning strategies. Thai TESOL Bulletin, 5 (4), 27-33.

Schmitt, N. (1997b). Personal communication at 31st IATEFL Conference, 2-5 April 1997, Brighton, UK.

Schmitt, N. (2007a). Vocabulary learning strategies. In McCarthy, M. & N. Schmitt (Eds). Vocabulary: Description, acquisition, and pedagogy. Cambridge University Press.

Un, K. (1984). Yabanci Dil Sozcuklerin Ogretilmesinde Bellek Destekleyici Anahtar Sozcuk Yonteminin Etkileri. (The Effects of Mnemonic Keyword Technique on Teaching Foreign Language Vocabulary). Unpublished PhD Thesis, Hacettepe University, Turkey.

Vann, R. J. & Abraham, R. G. (1990). Strategies of unsuccessful language learners.' TESOL Quarterly, 24, 177-198.

Von Glaserfeld, E. (1996). Introduction: Aspects of constructivism. In C. T. Fosnot (ed.). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press

Wesche, M. & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Revierw, 53 (1), 13-40.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies