Mitigation of Suggestions and Advice in Post-Observation Conferences Between 3 English Language Teacher Educators

Ayşegül Amanda Yeşilbursa

Abstract


Over the past two decades, there has been much research into the discourse of post-observation conferences in the supervision of teachers in both mainstream education and the teaching of English as a Foreign Language. However, the discourse of post-observation conferences in peer observation of teaching has received little attention. The purpose of this study is to investigate the way in which suggestions and advice are mitigated in such discourse. 21 audio-recorded and transcribed post-observation conferences held between 3 dyads of English Language teacher trainers as part of a larger action research project were analysed. It was found that both the observing and the observed teachers made suggestions and gave advice. The participants also made frequent use of negative politeness strategies, and less so positive politeness strategies, when offering suggestions and advice to their colleagues. The findings show that while collaborative in nature, post-observation conferences in peer observation of teaching can construe a threat to the face of the participants, even when power relations are levelled.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bailey, K.M. 2006. Language teacher supervision: A case-based approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, P. and S, Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chamberlin, C.R. 2000. ‘TESL degree candidate’s perceptions of trust in supervisors’. TESOL Quarterly, 34/4: 653-673.

Copland, F. 2010. ‘Causes of tension in pre-service teacher training: An alternative view’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26: 466-472.

Cosh, J. 1999. ‘Peer observation: a reflective model’. ELT Journal, Volume 53/1: 22-27.

Elliott, J. 1991 Action research for educational change. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Farrell, T.S.C. 2007. Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: Continuum.

Freeman, D. 1982. ‘Observing teachers: Three approaches to in-service training and development’. TESOL Quarterly, 16/1: 22-29.

Gebhard, J. G. and R, Oprandy. 1999. Language teaching awareness. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Goffman, E. 1967/2005. Interactional ritual: Essays in face to face behaviour. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Goldhammer, R., R.H. Anderson and R.J. Krajewsky. 1980. Clinical supervision: Special methods for the supervision of teachers. 2nd edition. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Hammersley-Fletcher, L. and P. Orsmond. 2004. ‘Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process?’ Studies in Higher Education, 29/4: 489-503.

Hammersley-Fletcher, L. and P. Orsmond. 2005. Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education, 30/2: 213-224.

Leech, G. 2004. Meaning and the English verb. 3rd edition. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

Martin, G.A. and J.M. Double. 1994. Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection. Innovation in Education and Training International, 35/2: 161-169.

Peel, D. 2005. ‘Peer observation as a transformatory tool?’ Teaching in Higher Education, 10/4: 489-504.

Richards, J.C. 1997 ‘Three approaches to observation’ The Language Teacher, September 1997 [Online document] Available at http://www.jalt- publications.org/tlt/files/97/sep/richards.html Accessed 19 May 2004.

Richards, J.C. and T.S.C. Farrell. 2005. Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Roberts, J. 1991. ‘Face threatening acts and politeness theory: Contrasting speeches from supervisory conferences’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, April 3-7, 1991. Available at http://www.eric.ed.gov Accessed 09 June 2010.

Schiffrin, D. 1994. Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Schuck, S., P. Aubusson and J. Buchanan. 2008. ‘Enhancing teacher education practice through professional learning conversations’. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31/2: 215-227.

Shortland, S. 2004. ‘Peer observation: A tool for staff development or compliance?’ Journal of Further and Higher Education, 28/2: 219-228.

Strong, M. and W. Baron. 2004. ‘An analysis of mentoring conversations with beginning teachers: Suggestions and responses’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20: 47- 57.

Vasquez, C. 2004. ‘Very carefully managedâ€: Advice and suggestions in post-observation meetings’. Linguistics and Education, 15: 33-58.

Vidmar, D. 2006. ‘Reflective peer coaching: Crafting collaborative self-assessment in teaching’. Research Strategies, 20: 135-148.

Waite, D. 1991. ‘Supervisors’ talk: Conversation analysis and the ethnography of supervisory conferences’. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL, April 3-7, 1991. Available at http://www.eric.ed.gov Accessed 14 June 2010.

Waite, D. 1993. ‘Teachers in conference: A qualitative study of teacher-supervisor face- to-face interactions’. American Educational Research Journal, 80/4: 675-702.

Wajnryb, R. 1992. Classroom observation tasks: a handbook for language teachers and trainers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wajnryb, R. 1994a. ‘The pragmatics of feedback: A study of mitigation in the supervisory discourse of TESOL teacher educators’. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Macquarie University, Sydney. Available at http://www.lib.mq.edu.au Accessed 14 June 2010.

Wajnryb, R. 1994b. ‘The perception of criticism: One trainee’s experience’. EA Journal, 13/1: 54-68.

Wajnryb, R. 1995. ‘Teachers’ perceptions of mitigation in supervisory discourse’. South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 23/1: 71-82.

Wajnryb, R. 1998. ‘Telling it like it isn’t – explaining an instance of pragmatic ambivalence in supervisory discourse’. Journal of Pragmatics, 29: 531-544.

Wallace, M. 1991. Training foreign language teachers: a reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies