Evaluation of an English preparatory program at a Turkish foundation university

İlknur Bayram, Özlem Canaran

Abstract


This study aims to evaluate the English Preparatory Program (EPP) offered at the Department of Foreign Languages (DFL) at an English-medium foundation university in Turkey during 2017-18 academic year to discover the strengths and weaknesses of the program. Participants of the study were 241 students and 26 teachers. The data were collected from the “Program Evaluation Survey†designed by the researchers and focus group meetings with students and teachers. The results revealed that the strengths of the EPP included homework assignments, exams and the program while the extracurricular activities and online programs were found to be the main weaknesses of the EPP. It was also found that student and teacher perceptions of the EPP showed statistically significant difference.  Finally, students and teachers suggested some improvements in terms of the pacing of the program, course books and supplementary booklets, number of the portfolio assignments and the picture description part in the Speaking Exam.  It is hoped that the findings of the study will contribute to the improvement of the existing program and lead to better learning opportunities for students in the coming years. 

Keywords: Program evaluation; English preparatory program; students; teachers; perspectives

Keywords


program evaluation; preparatory program

Full Text:

PDF

References


References

Akpur, U. (2017). Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi hazırlık öğretim programının değerlendirilmesi. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 6(4), 441-457.

Arap, B. (2016). An investigation into the implementation of English preparatory programs at tertiary level in Turkey. (Doktora Tezi). Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (Third Edition). New York: Longman.

Brown, S. (2005) Assessment for Learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 81-89.

CoÅŸkun, A. (2013). An investigation of the effectiveness of the modular general English language teaching preparatory program at a Turkish university. South African Journal of Education, 33(3).

Çelik-Yazıcı, İ., & Kahyalar, E. (2018). Evaluation of the preparatory program at Çukurova University: Focus on the content, the teaching-learning process and the assessment system. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 6(1), 231-240.

Erarslan, A , Zehir Topkaya, E . (2017). EFL Students Attitudes Towards e-Learning And Effect of An Online Course on Students Success in English. The Literacy Trek, 3(2), 80-101. Retrieved on July 28, 2018 from http://dergipark.gov.tr/literacytrek/issue/32167/350186

Flowerdew, J., & Peacock, M. (2001). (Eds.). Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research -ineducation (8th Ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Gardner, M., Roth, J., & Brooks-Gunn, 1. (2008). Adolescents' participation in organized activities and developmental success 2 and 8 years after high school: Do sponsorship, duration, and intensity matter? Developmental Psychology, 44(3), 814-830.

Goldsmith, J. (2009). Pacing and time allocation at the micro- and meso-level within the class hour: Why pacing is important, how to study it, and what it implies for individual lesson planning. Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 1(1), 30-48.

İnal, B., & Aksoy, E. (2014). Çankaya Üniversitesi hazırlık sınıfı, İngilizce hazırlık öğretim programının değerlendirilmesi. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 85-98.

Kirkpatrick, T. A. (2011). Internationalization or Englishization? Medium of Instruction in Today's Universities. Center for Governance and Citizenship. The Hong Kong Institute of Education. Working Paper Series No. 2011 / 003.

Owen, J. M. (2007). Program evaluation: Forms and approaches (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

Öner, G., & Mede, E. (2015). Evaluation of A1 level program at an English preparatory school in a Turkish university: A case study. International Association of Research in Foreign Language Education and Applied Linguistics ELT Research Journal, 4(3), 204-226.

Özdoruk-Höke, P. (2016). Evaluation of the English Language preparatory school curriculum at Yıldırım Beyazıt University. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Royse, D., Thyer, B. A., & Padgett, D. K. (2010). Program evaluation: An introduction. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

Sanders, J. R., & Sullins, C. D. (2006). Evaluating school programs: An educator’s guide. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage, Newbury Park, California.

TEPAV (2013). Turkey national needs assessment of state school English language teaching. Ankara: Mattek Matbaacılık.

TEPAV. (2015). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim kurumlarındaki ingilizce eğitimi. Bir durum analizi, Ankara: Tasarım ve Baskı Yayıncılık.

Weir, C. J., & Roberts, J. (1994). Evaluation in ELT. Oxford: Blackwell.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies