Identification of substitution and Ellipsis in Leo Tolstoy’s short story by English Language major students

Jayashree Premkumar Shet

Abstract


This study is based on the results of the research which aimed (1) to identify the cohesive devices used by Leo Tolstoy in A grain as Big as a Hen’s Egg as proposed by Halliday & Hasan and (2) to find whether substitution and ellipsis from the same story could be identified by the seven English Major students doing the Discourse Analysis Course during the final assessment after being taught The research followed descriptive quality method and there was also a small quantitative method comparing the actual and identified substitution and ellipsis devices. The results of the research show that the ellipsis ‘substitution by zero’ Halliday & Hasan (1976: 142), is dominant in A grain as Big as a Hen’s Egg, the short story in which the devices form aesthetically Tolstoy’s lucid and succinct style, which makes the parable clear to all who read it. Ellipsis is so imbibed in communication that ESL learners could identify it better than substitutions


Keywords


Identification; Substitution and Ellipsis; English Major Students; Leo Tolstoy; Language

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alyousef, H. & Alnasser, M. (2015). A study of Cohesion in International Postgraduate Students’ Multimodal Management Accounting Texts. Arab World English Journal, 6(3), 30 – 46.

Ellipsis and substitution, ELT Concourse teacher training https://www.eltconcourse.com/training/ inservice/ discourse/ellipsis_substitution.html

Ezra.M. Leo Tolstoy - Style Analysis, 6 May, 2021 https://leotolstoygp.tripod.com/id15.html

Eranıl, A. K., Özcan, M., & Özek, B. Y. (2019). Examination of classroom management competencies of faculty of education students. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 25(1), 119-138. doi:10.14527/kuey.2019.003

Ghasemi, M. (2013). An investigation into the use of cohesive devices in second language writings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(9), 1615-1623.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

Hasannejad, M., Assadi, N. & Kazemi, A. (2012). Substitution as a device of grammatical cohesion in English contexts. The Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(1), 114-136.

Jabeen, I. Mehmood, A. Iqbal, M. (2013). Ellipsis, Refference & Subtitution as Cohesive Devices The Bear by Anton Chekhov. SAVAP International Jounal, 4(6), 123-131.

Kudo, Y. (2009). A fundamental study of the characteristics of grammatical cohesion in writing with regard to difference in English writing proficiency levels and discourse modes. ARCLES Review, 4, 38-54.

Kesik, F., & Aslan, H. (2020). Metaphoric expressions of the students about the concept of happiness. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 26(2), 303-354. doi:10.14527/kuey.2020.007

Meisuo, Z. (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC Journal, 31(1), 61-95.

Nga, N. T. T. (2011). Ellipsis in Abstracts of Business Journal Articles in English

and Vietnamese. Vietnam: University of Danang. 1-26.

Ramasawmy & Narainsamy, (2004). Conjunctive cohesion and relational coherence in students’ compositions. Unpublished thesis, South Africa University.

Rosyidah. (2019). Ellipsis As Aesthetic Formal Marker of the Short Story Das Brot. KnE Social Sciences, 3(10), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3895

Sayah, L. & Fatemi, A. (2013). The role of conjunctions in EFL learners' narrative development. International Journal of Education and Research, 1(11), 133-146.

Tolstoy, Leo. "A Grain as Big as a Hen's Egg." The Literature Network. 2008. Jalic Inc. 17 Jan 2008 http://www.online-literature.com/tolstoy/2728/.

Yang, W. & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23, 31-48.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies