Bullying in trump’s tweets through Covid-19: A pragmatic perspective

Hussein Hameed Ma’yuuf, Ibtihal Jasim Abbas

Abstract


Nowadays, everyone can witness the importance of the internet and the role it plays as a means of communication. Tweeter is one of the best social networking websites now. This type of social media, people create an online profile through enlisting personal facts and interests, connect with other users, and sharing updates of information that is posted daily (Hargittai and Hsieh, 2011: 47). Besides the positive sides that such media have, there are some negative issues that these media may reflect. Bulling is one of these negatives.

Pragmatically, this paper concerns itself with studying cyberbullying in Trump’s tweeters. Consequently, the data will be analyzed according to some pragmatic theories like politeness, implicature, and pragmatic metaphor. The questions that the paper tries to answer are: (1) Does Trump use a direct bully or indirect one? (2) What are the polite strategies that Trump tries to use in order to minimize the effect of bullying? (3) Are there any implied meanings in Trump’s tweeters that he wants to convey? To answer these questions, the following aims are put: (1) showing whether Trump uses an explicit bullying or an implicit one, (2) clarifying the polite strategies that Trump may use in his tweeters, (3) shedding light on the implied meanings in Trump’s tweeters. Working on these aims, the following hypotheses are suggested: (1) Trump uses explicit and implicit bullying in his tweeters, (2) there are certain strategies that Trump follows in his bullying, and (3) there are some implied meanings (implicature) that Trump is behind.


Keywords


bullying; pragmatics; speech act; impoliteness; implicature

Full Text:

PDF

References


Black, Elizabeth. (2006). Pragmatic Stylistics. Edinburgh University Press.

Brown, Gillian and George Yule. (1983). Discourse Analysis. CUP.

Brown, P and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an Anatomy of Impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349–367.

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J., Derek B., Anne W. (2003). Impoliteness Revisited with Special Reference to Dynamic and Prosodic Aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 1545 – 1579.

Cutting, J. (2003). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. Routledge

Donegan, Richard. (2012). Bullying and Cyberbullying: History, Statistics, Law, Prevention and Analysis. In The Elon Journal of Undergraduate Research in Communications, 3(1), Spring

Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual. Chicago: Aldine Publishing.

Harper, D. (2008, October 10). Online etymology dictionary. Retrieved from http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?allowed_in_frame=0&search=bully&searchmode=none

Hargittai & Eszter Hsieh, Yu-Li P. (2011): From Dabblers to Omnivores. In: Papacharissi, Zizi (ed.) (2011): A Networked self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. Routledge: 146–168.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.

Wright, Richard A. (1975). “Meaning non-natural and Conversational Implicature”, Cole and Morgan. Syntax and Semantics Vol. 3: Speech Act. Academia Press.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.

Websites

https://www.merriam webster.com/dictionary/cyber bullying # legal Dictionary


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies