EFL students' writing performance: A study of the role of peer and small-group feedback

Hani Hamad M Albelihi, Arif Ahmed Mohammed Hassan Al-Ahdal

Abstract


Writing in English is often regarded as the most difficult of the four English language skills. Feedback is considered an essential component of the writing process as it helps students improve their writing skills. There is a general agreement that waiting for the instructor’s feedback in a large class is impractical; therefore, implementing "peer input" in the writing classroom is a problem. The effectiveness of peer feedback in improving students' writing skills has been dealt with in many research works. However, how peer feedback should be done has been ignored and is only used in restricted circumstances. In this study, two kinds of peer feedback were examined to see which one had the most impact on students’ writing. The sample comprised 65 EFL students from Qassim University. Results showed that providing students with online-class peer feedback and small group peer feedback improved their writing skills. However, neither of these approaches proved to be more successful than the other. As an implication of this study, Saudi universities need to adopt an engaging, practical, collaborative, and nonthreatening approach to writing which will help students develop their writing skills towards global communicative competence. 


Keywords


EFL; peer feedback; online-class; Qassim University; small-group feedback; writing performance

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abri, A. A. (2021). Exploring EFL learners' comments on web-based peer feedback: Local and global Revisions. English Language Teaching, 14(6), 114-124.

Al Abri, A., Al Baimani, S., & Bahlani, S. (2021). The role of web-based peer feedback in advancing EFL essay writing. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 22(1), 374-390.

Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. & Hussein, N. M. A. (2020). WhatsApp as a writing tool in EFL classroom: A study across two universities in Saudi Arabia. Asian EFL Journal, 27(3.1), 374-392

Alfallaj, F. S. S. (2020). Technology in Saudi EFL undergraduate classrooms: Learning tool or weapon of distraction? The Asian ESP Journal, 16 (4), 97- 115.

Alkodimi, K. A., & Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. (2021). Strategies of teaching writing at Saudi tertiary-level institutions: Reality and expectations. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 12(2), 399- 413. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol12no2.27

Alsehibany, R. A. (2021). EFL Saudi student's attitudes toward peer feedback activities in a writing class. PSU Research Review, 14(1). https://www.emerald.com/insight/2399-1747.htm

Álvarez, G., Colombo, L. M., & Difabio, H. (2020). Peer feedback in an online dissertation writing workshop. Signum: Estudos da Linguagem, 24(1), 80-96.

Bai, B., & Guo, W. (2021). Motivation and self-regulated strategy use: Relationships to primary school students’ English writing in Hong Kong. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 378-399.

Bhatti, A., Pathan, H., Tabieh, A., & Hassan, A. (2020). Impact of learner-learner rapport on L2 learning: A study of public sector universities in Sindh, Pakistan. The Asian EFL Journal, 27(4.6), 204-226.

Burgess, A., Roberts, C., Lane, A. S., Haq, I., Clark, T., Kalman, E., & Bleasel, J. (2021). Peer review in team-based learning: influencing feedback literacy. BMC medical education, 21(1), 1-11.

Camarata, T., & Slieman, T. A. (2020). Improving student feedback quality: A simple model using peer review and feedback rubrics. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, 7, 2382120520936604.

Chen, J. (2021). Research on the effect of peer feedback training in English writing teaching- A case study of students in Business English major. English Language Teaching, 14(6), 12-24.

Chong, S. W. (2021). Reconsidering student feedback literacy from an ecological perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 92-104.

Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Gai, X. (2021). Peer feedback and teacher feedback: a comparative study of revision effectiveness in writing instruction for EFL learners. Higher Education Research & Development, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1969541

Duong, Q. P., & Pham, T. N. (2021). Moving beyond four walls and forming a learning community for speaking practice under the auspices of Facebook. E- Learning and Digital Media, 20427530211028067.

Elboshi, A. (2021). Web-enhanced peer feedback in ESL writing classrooms a literature review. English Language Teaching, 14(4), 66-76.

Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Polakowski, N., Gunderson, B., Shultz, G. V., & Gere, A. R. (2021). Utilizing peer review and revision in STEM to support the development of conceptual knowledge through writing. Written Communication, 38(3), 351-379 https://doi.org/10.1177%2F07410883211006038

Gravett, K., Kinchin, I. M., Winstone, N. E., Balloo, K., Heron, M., Hosein, A., & Medland, E. (2020). The development of academics’ feedback literacy: Experiences of learning from critical feedback via scholarly peer review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 651-665.

Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: the influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680-696.

Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Aitken, A. A., Barkel, A., Houston, J., & Ray, A. (2017). Teaching spelling, writing, and reading for writing: Powerful evidence-based practices. Teaching Exceptional Children, 49(4), 262-272.

Hentasmaka, D., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). Peer feedback uptakes and outcomes across EFL students' proficiency levels: A study at tertiary education in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 271-286.

Ho, P. V. P., Phung, L. T. K., Oanh, T. T. T., & Giao, N. Q. (2020). Should peer e- comments replace traditional peer comments? International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 295-314.

Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2019). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 863- 880.

Kaçar, I. G. (2021). The impact of online and face-to-face peer feedback on pre- service teachers in EFL academic writing. In Design Solutions for Adaptive Hypermedia Listening Software (pp. 124-163). IGI Global.

Kusumaningrum, S. R. (2021). The effect of teacher and peer feedback provided through Edmodo on students' writing performance. SKRIPSI Mahasiswa UM.

López-Pellisa, T., Rotger, N., & Rodríguez-Gallego, F. (2021). Collaborative writing at work: Peer feedback in a blended learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 1293-1310.

Lumabi, B. M., & Tabajen, R. (2021). College Students' experience in online asynchronous peer feedback in writing. TESOL and Technology Studies, 2(2), 41-54.

Magulod, G. C. (2018). Use of innovative prewriting techniques in enhancing the writing performance and attitude of second year information technology students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6(2), 1-9.

Martin, S. D., & Dismuke, S. (2018). Investigating differences in teacher practices through a complexity theory lens: The influence of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 69(1), 22-39.

Maysyaroh, S., Nainggolan, F., & Suka, R. G. (2020). The implementation of peer- feedback in enhancing students’ writing achievement at SMA Negeri 1 Ketapang. U-JET, 9(2). http://jurnal.fkip.unila.ac.id/index.php/123/article/view/20827

Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021). Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback. Computers in human behavior, 117, 106658.

Newman, S., & Latifi, A. (2021). Vygotsky, education, and teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(1), 4-17.

Pham, T. N., Lin, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Bui, L. T. P. (2020). Electronic peer feedback, EFL academic writing and reflective thinking: Evidence from a Confucian context. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244020914554.

Saeed, M.A., Al-Ahdal, A. A. M. H. & Al-Qunayeer, H.S. (2020). Integrating research proposal writing into a postgraduate research method course: What does it tell us? International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(4). 303-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1777963

Salinas, A. M. (2020). Writing development through materials that focus on peer feedback in an EFL context. Enletawa Journal, 13(1), 20-56.

Simonsmeier, B. A., Peiffer, H., Flaig, M., & Schneider, M. (2020). Peer feedback improves students' academic self-concept in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 61(6). https://www.uni- trier.de/fileadmin/fb1/prof/PSY/PAE/Team/Schneider/SimonsmeierEtAl202 0.pdf

Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). The Effects of Providing and Receiving Peer Feedback on Writing Performance and Learning of Secondary School Students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492-526.

Yatifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. (2021). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching Internationa Liu, F., https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005

Yu, S. (2021). Giving genre-based peer feedback in academic writing: Sources of knowledge and skills, difficulties and challenges. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(1), 36-53.

Zainurrahman, Z. (2021). The structure of peer feedback. LANGUA: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Education, 4(1), 14-34.

Zhang, Z. V. (2020). Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions. Assessing Writing, 43, 100439.

Zhang, X., & McEneaney, J. E. (2020). What is the influence of peer feedback and author response on Chinese University students’ English writing performance? Reading Research Quarterly, 55(1), 123-146.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies