A semantic prosody analysis of three synonymous adjective pairs in COCA
Abstract
The concept of semantic prosody has attracted considerable research interests in the past two decades since Sinclair (1990) observed that “many uses of words and phrases show a tendency to occur in a certain semantic environment†(p. 112). Sinclair (2003) also noted that semantic prosody conveys its pragmatic meaning and attitudinal meaning. As the first scholar introducing the term ‘semantic prosody,’ Louw (1993) claimed that the habitual collocates of a lexical item is established through the semantic consistency of its subjects. Semantic prosody has thus been closely related to collocation learning in language acquisition research. In the context of collocation learning, near-synonyms particularly pose a difficulty for most foreign language learners due to their similar denotational meanings but un-interchangeable semantic prosody (Xiao & McEnery, 2006).
The present corpus-based study was designed to compare the semantic prosody with some synonymous pairs of academic core words in COCA (Gardner & Davies, 2013). The pairs were chosen based on the following criteria: a) their meanings were checked against Collins Thesaurus Online; b) the words with more than one meaning were removed; c) the word with more than one part of speech was defined the same as its paired word. All occurrences were examined manually at the span of 4 words to both the left and right. Three pairs of synonymous adjectives were reported. The report focused on the semantic preference and semantic prosody of the synonyms within academic concordance lines. Discussion and implications were included.Â
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hunston, S. (2007). Semantic prosody revisited. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 12(2), 249-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.12.2
Louw, W. E. (1993). “Irony in the Text or Insincerity in the Writer? In M. Baker (Ed.), The Diagnostic Potential of Semantic Prosodies.†Text and Technology: In Honour of John Sinclair (pp. 157-176). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Louw, B. (2000). Contextual prosodic theory: Bringing semantic prosodies to life. In Heffer, C., H. Sauntson, and G. Fox (Eds.), Words in Context: A Tribute to John Sinclair on his Retirement (pp. 41-55). Birmingham: University of Birmingham.
Louw, B., & Chateau, C. (2004). Semantic prosody for the 21st century: Are prosodies smoothed in academic contexts. Proceedings of JADT 2010: Tenth International Conference of Statistical Analysis of Textual Data (pp. 755-764). Retrieved Sept. 14, 2013 from http://www.ledonline.it/ledonline/JADT-2010/allegati/JADT-2010-0755-0764_129-Louw.pdf
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2011). Corpus linguistics: method, theory, and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nelson, M. (2006). Semantic associations in Business English: A corpus-based analysis. English for Specific Purposes, 25, 217-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2005.02.008
Parington, A. (1998). Using Corpora for English Language Research and Teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Partington, A. (2004). Utterly content in each other’s company: semantic prosody and semantic preference. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 131-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.
Sinclair, J. (1996). The empty lexicon. International journal of corpus linguistics, 1(1), 99-119.
Sinclair, J. (1999). A way with common words. In H. Hasselgard & S. Oksefjell (Eds.), Out of Corpora: Studies in honour of Stig Johansson (pp. 157-179). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Xiao, R. Z. and McEnery, A. M. (2006). Collocation, semantic prosody and near synonymy: A cross-linguistic perspective. Applied Linguistics, 27 (1), 103-129. Doi: 10.1093/applin/ami045.
Wei, N., & Li, X. (2014). Exploring semantic preference and semantic prosody across English and Chinese: Their roles for cross-linguistic equivalence. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory. 10(1), 103-138. Doi: 10.1515/cllt-2013-0018, June 2013.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies