Internalised Psycho-Emotional Disablism In Pat Barker’s Toby’s Room
Abstract
The disabled have always been looked at through an alien lens by the non-disabled bodies. This had led to an exclusion or complete invisibility of them in the societal structure. Evidently, the disabled suffer from two major forms of disablism. This paper attempts to analyse how the disabled suffer damage to their emotional well-being that arises from various factors which become internalised over a period. The constructed ‘disabled identity’ and the ‘abled gaze’ push the disabled towards the margins and makes them lose their self-esteem and identity. They are made to believe that they are inferior to the constructed normative ideal body. Psycho-emotional disablism isolates the disabled individual from the mainstream society. This paper hence argues that disability is a cultural construct as much as it is physical phenomenon, which ultimately leads to an internalised psycho-emotional disablism. As an interdisciplinary discourse, the novel ‘Toby’s Room’ by the British novelist Pat Barker is taken to situate and analyse the aforementioned ideas.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Barker, C., & Murray, S. (2017). The Cambridge companion to literature and
disability. Cambridge University Press.
Barker, P. (2008). Life class. Penguin UK.
Campbell, J., & Oliver, M. (2013). Disability politics: Understanding our past, changing our future. Routledge.
Garland-Thomson, R. (1997). Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. Columbia UP.
Griffiths, M. (2019). These Days Are Ours: Exploring Young Disabled People's Experiences and Views of the Disabled People's Movement [Doctoral dissertation].
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/200750039.pdf
Goodley, D. (2012). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. SAGE.
Goodley, D. (2014). DIS/ability studies: Theorising disablism and ableism. Routledge.
Hahn, H. (1986). Public support for rehabilitation programs: The analysis of U.S. disability policy. Disability, Handicap & Society, 1(2), 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1080/02674648666780131
Hughes, B. (1999). The Constitution of impairment: Modernity and the aesthetic of oppression. Disability & Society, 14(2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599926244
Jung, K. E. (2002). Chronic illness and educational equity: The politics of visibility. NWSA Journal, 14(3), 178-200. https://doi.org/10.2979/nws.2002.14.3.178
Kitchin, R. (1998). 'Out of place', 'Knowing one's place': Space, power and the exclusion of disabled people. Disability & Society, 13(3), 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599826678
Loja, E., Costa, M. E., Hughes, B., & Menezes, I. (2012). Disability, embodiment and ableism: Stories of resistance. Disability & Society, 28(2), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.705057
Michalko, R. (2002). The difference that disability makes. Temple University Press.
Rae, L. (2019). Disciplining Disability: Intersections between Critical Disability Studies and Cultural Studies. In K. Ellis, R. Garland-Thomson, & M. Kent (Eds.), Manifestos for the future of critical disability studies: Volume 1 (pp. 217-229). Routledge.
Reeve, D. (2008). Negotiating disability in everyday life: the experience of psycho-
emotionaldisablism. Unpublished PhD thesis, Lancaster.
Thomas, C. (2007). Sociologies of disability and illness: Contested ideas in disability studies and medical sociology. Macmillan International Higher Education.
Waldschmidt, A., Berressem, H., &Ingwersen, M. (Eds.). (2017). Culture - Theory - Disability: Encounters between disability studies and cultural studies. transcript Verlag.
Wasson, S. (2020). SPECTRALITY, STRANGENESS, AND STIGMAPHILIA. In A. L. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge Companion to Literature and Disability (pp. 70-81). Routledge.
Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies