Politeness Strategies Of Filipino Teenagers In The Household
Abstract
Politeness achieves effective communication and maintains relationship. More so, Filipinos are always known to be docile, respectful, and courteous when conversing with the elders however, related studies stated that the absence of politeness becomes evident in teenager’s response in conversing with their parents. This qualitative research study employing discourse analysis investigated the different politeness strategies of Filipino teenagers in their household. It used a corpora of ten household conversations of parents and teenagers. Conversations were observed and recorded with the signed and approved informed consent form (ICF). The study was analysed using the framework of Brown and Levinson’s politeness strategies. Results revealed that the four politeness strategies were present in the conversation between teenagers and parents in the household. Filipino teenagers generally utilized positive politeness to express kinship and to keep close relationship with their parents while chatting and conversing at home; bald on records to offer a clear and explicit message; negative politeness to lessen the coercion to their parents and off record to drop indications. These politeness strategies of Filipino teenagers in the household show that they are respectful in conversation with their elders however at times lack the appropriate respect and manner when they directly command their parents to do something. Further, teenagers converse with their parents by showing friendly behaviour that shows warmth but were also unmannered at some point. This shows that their behaviour has something to do with the upbringing and with how they were raised and what culture and environment they grew up with. Indeed, the environment and mores at home had an impact on the politeness methods used in the household conversations.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Akilandeswari, V., Kumar, A. D., Freeda, A. P., & Kumar, S. N. (2015). Elements
of effective communication. New Media and Mass Communication, 37, 44-47.
Azwan, A. (2018). Politeness strategies of refusals to requests by Ambonese community. LINGUA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 15(1), 1-6.
Bonvillain, N. (2019). Language, culture, and communication: The meaning of messages. Rowman & Littlefield.
Castells, M. (2013). Communication power. Oxford University Press.
Chen, R., He, L., & Hu, C. (2013). Chinese requests: In comparison to American and Japanese requests and with reference to the “East-West divide”. Journal of Pragmatics, 55, 140 161.
Cohen, A. D. (2020). Considerations in assessing pragmatic appropriateness in spoken language. Language Teaching, 53(2), 183-202.
Dybko, K. (2010). The Role of Politeness in Advertisements’ Slogans: A Study within Gricean Pragmatics. ACTA PHILOLOGICA, 20.
Eelen, G. (2014). A Critique of Politeness Theory: Volume 1. Routledge.
Grainger, K. (2018). “We’re not in a club now”: a neo-Brown and Levinson approach to analyzing courtroom data. Journal of Politeness Research, 14(1), 19-38.
Hamrakulova, G. (2020). Politeness theory in language. Mental Enlightenment Scientific Methodological Journal, 2020(2), 151-157.
Kdar, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness. Cambridge Universit Press.
Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in society, 2(1), 45-79.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Pragmatics, discourse analysis, stylistics and “The Celebrated Letter”.
Leech, G. (2005). Politeness: is there an East-West divide. Journal of Foreign Languages, 6(3).
Lwin, S. M. (2022). Discourse analysis. In Research Anthology on Applied Linguistics and Language Practices (pp. 1573-1595). IGI Global.
Mahmud, M. (2019). The use of politeness strategies in the classroom context by English university students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 597-606
Makaria, E. C., & Adawiyah, R. R. R. (2021, February). Teenagers’ Promiscuity of Alpha Generation. In The 2nd International Conference on Social Sciences Education (ICSSE 2020) (pp. 204-209). Atlantis Press.
Mubarak, A. S. J., & Rhaif, K. K. (2022). Politeness strategies in motivational storytelling by American
commencement speakers. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(1), 22-39.
Ondigi, E. A. (2021). A review of politeness. Journal of African Studies and Ethnographic Research, 3(4).
Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2011). Mixed methods research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4, 285-300.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods. sage.
Radovic Markovic, M., & Salamzadeh, A. (2018). The Importance of Communication in Business Management, The 7th International Scientific Conference on Employment, Education and Entrepreneurship, Belgrade,Serbia.
Rocci, A., & de Saussure, L. (Eds.). (2016). Verbal communication (Vol. 3). Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Sarania, S. M. D. (2019). Clash of Bloods: Sentiments of Parents and Teenagers Having Conflict with Each Other. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2O).
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S.W., (2012). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse approach. Blackwell Oxford.
Sukarno, S. (2018). Politeness strategies, linguistic markers and social contexts in delivering requests inJavanese. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(3), 659-667.
Terada, K., Okazoe, M., & Gratch, J. (2021, September). Effect of politeness strategies in dialogue on negotiation outcomes. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (pp. 195-202).
Utari, A. P., & Sulandari, S. (2019). Respectful Attitude on Adolescents to Elderly.
Wamboldt, F., & Reiss, D. (1989). Defining a family heritage and a new relationship identity: Two central tasks in the making of a marriage. Family Process, 28, 317–335.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies