Legal Frameworks For Facing Environmental Pollution Crimes: A Comparative Study Of Jordanian Legislation And International Agreements

Fahad Yousef Alkassaabeh, Mohamed Abdel Khaleq Al-Zoubi

Abstract


The environment from a legal perspective is the natural framework that accommodates humans, animals, plants, and natural factors to preserve these organisms through a process of balance between them. Environmental pollution, originating from various sources, presents a pressing global concern with significant ramifications for ecological systems, public health, and social well-being. This study aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of how legal frameworks at the internal and external of  levels address the multifaceted problem of environmental pollution. This study holds significance in a world increasingly affected by environmental degradation. By examining the legal dimensions of the problem and exploring solutions within the framework of domestic legislation and international cooperation, this research contributes to the broader efforts aimed at addressing and mitigating environmental pollution. findings from this research are provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of existing legal frameworks for environmental pollution. The discussion of findings will address the practical implications for policymakers, legal professionals, and environmental organizations.


Keywords


Environmental pollution crimes, international conventions, Environmental law, Domestic legislation.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cole, M., Lindeque, P., Halsband, C., & Galloway, T. S. (2011). Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 62(12), 2588-2597.

World Health Organization. (2016). Ambient Air Pollution: A Global Assessment of Exposure and Burden of Disease .

United Nations. (2018). Sustainable Development Goal 6: Synthesis Report on Water and Sanitation.

Timperley J. (2020). Who is really to blame for climate Change? https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20200618-climate-change-who-is-to-blame-and-why-does-it-matter.

Pan, Y., Wu, D., Wu, L., & Li, J. (2017). The impact of soil pollution on food safety in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(10), 9409-9419.

Cinzano, P., Falchi, F., & Elvidge, C. D. (2001). The first world atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 328(3), 689-707.

Sala, O. E., et al. (2000). Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science, 287(5459), 1770-1774.

Bojārs, J. (2008). Starptautiskās publiskās tiesības IV. Apgāds Zvaigzne ABC (In Latvian).Climate Change and Health. World Health Organization. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ climate-change-and-health.

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2021). Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis

Farber, D. A. (2010). Pollution and the law. In Environmental Law (8th ed., pp. 357-384). Wolters Kluwer.

Bodansky, D. (2010). International law and global climate change. In Environmental Law (8th ed., pp. 891-921). Wolters Kluwer

Harfst, J. (2010). Environmental law: Historical roots. In Environmental Law (8th ed., pp. 1-23). Wolters Kluwer.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). The Clean Air Act. https://www.epa.gov/clean-air-act-overview

Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin.

Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q.

Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1251-1387.

Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544.

Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer, 16 U.S.T. 8175. Johnson, M. (2018). International cooperation in addressing environmental pollution. In S. Green (Ed.), Global Environmental Governance: Issues and Challenges (pp. 87-104). APA Publishers.

Smith, J. (2020). Transboundary pollution and international law. International Environmental Affairs, 36(2), 213-228.

UNEP. (2001). Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants. UNEP.

UNEP. (1989). Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and Their Disposal. UNEP.

UNFCCC. (2015). The Paris Agreement. UNFCCC.

OECD. (1972). Recommendation of the Council on Guiding Principles Concerning International Economic Aspects of Environmental Policies. OECD Publishing.

UNEP. (1972). Governing Council Decision 4/9: Establishment of the United Nations Environment Programme. UNEP.

UN. (1945). Charter of the United Nations. United Nations.

Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. MIT Press.

Bodansky, D. (2016). The Paris Climate Change Agreement: A new hope? American Journal of International Law, 110(2), 288-319.

Charnovitz, S. (2017). Trade and environment: Revisiting the basics. In Handbook of Trade and the Environment (pp. 31-58). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Falkner, R. (2016). Global environmental politics and the imperialism of the Anthropocene. International Affairs, 92(3), 585-606.

Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (2006). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: The case of the Cartagena Protocol and the World Trade Organization. Global Environmental Politics, 6(4), 1-31.

Victor, D. G. (2011). The collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the struggle to slow global warming. Princeton University Press.

Voigt, C., & Ferreira, F. (2017). Five tensions in the law of international responsibility for climate change. In Climate Change Liability (pp. 175-195). Cambridge University Press.

Young, O. R. (2016). The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Causal connections and behavioral mechanisms. MIT Press.

Meyer, T. (2018). National law and domestic environmental norms: India’s response to international environmental agreements. Transnational Environmental Law, 7(3), 375-398.

Reinisch, A. (2018). Direct Applicability of International Agreements in Domestic Law. In The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law (pp. 665-682). Oxford University Press.

Tushnet, M. (2020). Comparative constitutional law: A global and intergenerational perspective. Oxford University Press.

Elisabeth, Thuestad, Isaksen. (2020). Have international pollution protocols made a difference. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, doi: 10.1016/J.JEEM.2020.102358.

Noor, Issa, Alhendi., Muamar, Hasan, Salameh. (2023). Environmental Pollution Crime. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, doi: 10.14505/jemt.14.1(65).17

Olivi, L. (2022). The public’s perception of the seriousness of environmental crimes related to environmental pollution and illegal waste trade. A case study of the province of Brescia, Italy. Journal of Illicit Economies and Development, 4(1).

Trias, Hernanda., Urip, Giyono. (2022). Environmental Legal Protection of Rivers in the Perspective of Sustainable Development. Jurnal Jurisprudence, doi: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v11i1.14744.

Elena, A., Sukhova., E., N., Abanina., Marina, A., Alcova. (2022). Development of legal provision for environmental security of the Russian Federation in the context of implementing sustainable development goals. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, doi: 10.17223/22253513/43/14

Michael, Günther., Tim, Hellmann. (2017). International environmental agreements for local and global pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, doi: 10.1016/J.JEEM.2016.09.001.

Pierre-Marie, Dupuy., Jorge, E., Viñuales. (2018). International Environmental Law. doi: 10.1017/9781108399821


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies
ISSN 1305-578X (Online)
Copyright © 2005-2022 by Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies